DCSTS was founded as a cooperation company specifically feeding the need of construction and mining companies looking for reliable reserves and consumables at reasonable prices.
We are a truly presto-growing company with largely innovative mates with a charge to lead the transformation into a more digital and sustainable henceforth. Inside mining and advancement, we have accumulated plan understanding and devoted guests in multitudinous exercises in India as well as in import requests. still, mines, highways, if you operate in a chase. We have a result for you.
We cover sectors from mining, construction, brand, cement, structure, Pharma, Hospital, and recovery industriousness. We have products and attacks that can feed the industriousness mentioned. High Durability With 40 times moxie manufacturing the mini excavator, we design the products paying attention to every detail to help damage and destruction. Thus, in this way, Kubota laid out a person for high congruity with callers all over the earth.
Superior Performance Kubota’s mini excavators have the power and versatility to take on nearly any kind of task, indeed in the toughest terrain.
Joining bettered digging and lifting power with smooth drivability, they will finish the work properly.
Zero-tail Swing the Kubota mini excavator adopts a zero-tail swing structure. When the machine is swinging, the tail always remains within the track range. It realizes solicitude-free operation in tight places.
The Excavator Attachments accompanied a General Device transporter, which reacted in an important high position place of machine operation and viability. Excavator attachments are planned and raised to the most extreme prosecution well-being. Excavator attachments are finagled to boost the power and acceptability of your backhoe and convey the most effectiveness.
Excavators come all the farther actually progressed every time. Trendy machines have better energy operations, lower discharges, produce lower bouleversements, and give farther power than one model. Progressed PC fabrics screen the earthmover’s well-being and estimate director execution.
important with important attachments, your Excavator will be further than just an excavator and help you with multiple high-intensity shops at multiple job spots with ease.
Reliable DCS Techno attachments will help you grow your business, gain versatility, replace fewer effective machines, and give you the tools to negotiate major systems. Effective Robust and reliable attachments that give effective and safe operation combined with durable and reliable pivotal advancements from our long involvement with the worldwide Excavator Business
DCS Techno Excavator Attachments are known for their responsibility, heavy-duty structure, and excellent performance in the field. DCS Techno Excavator Attachments are designed to perform different operations analogous to road construction, irrigation, mining, material handling, substance recycling, etc.
We are continuously working to add further attachments as per the requested conditions & our ultimate thing is to make Hyundai a one-stop result for products and all attachments.
These excavators correspond to an innovative hydraulic system that makes the machine presto, smooth, easy to control, and can navigate through a wide range of landscapes in smaller spaces.
These reliable hydraulic excavators combine safety, comfort, effectiveness, and durability to give you complete control over your quotidian operations and allow fast cycle times. These hydraulic excavators feature advanced and upgraded ECO Mode & energy saving accouterments for maximum energy effectiveness, ease of operation, and advanced productivity.
DCS Techno outfit Excavator Attachments have no way of Surrender and are the toughest in the sedulity. With the right attachments, you can conquer any job not only excavation, but also mulching, cutting, ripping, breaking, compacting, lifting, loading, and much further. Our containers and different connections are intense and staggeringly adaptable.
Expand the avail of your mini excavator’s bucket with a thumb attachment to get a better grip when scuffling debris or carriage your excavator with a ripper to pull up beams and sums and scarify earth. still, there is a DCS Techno Equipment attachment to conquer it, if there is a handicap.
Excavators are necessary to outfit pieces in the earthmoving business. They are also inestimable for general construction and mileage work, obliteration and scrap businesses, chase, and aggregate operations as well as handling waste and recycling products. However, no mistrustfulness you will find an excavator hard If there’s material to move.
It is not only an issue of utilizing a tractor to dig, freight, or spread. It is new requests like what farm truck types, what sizes, what power, and what associations you'll get around revealing positions. It is easy to get confused when probing excavators.
You’ll find several different types of excavators available, similar to mini excavators, backhoe excavators, extended-reach excavators, and indeed excavators erected to use suction rather than teeth. Excavators also have complex corridors and a surprising array of attachments available.
EXCAVATOR ATTACHMENTS
There are a lot of excavator designs, sizes, and shapes on the request, and an equal or lesser choice of excavator attachments. Excavators are limited to digging, loading, backfilling, or spreading material for canted job spots. With the right work tool attachments, you can turn your machine into a protean supporter that can perform numerous places.
Work tool attachments are what really brought excavators into the ultra-modern construction world. Where excavators were formerly limited to bulwarks, they are snow cross-industry outfits with tools that transfigure your job point performance. They are just many excavator-friendly attachments available.
Augers An auger will enable your excavator to drill holes in the ground snappily and efficiently. Typical operations include digging footings, potholes, and tree and shrub plantings.
Pails Equipping your excavator with the right pails will enhance its material handling capabilities. We can give pails designed for tasks like remittal, digging, gutter cleaning, grading, and colorful general, heavy, extreme, and severe-duty tasks.
Compactors Our selection of vibratory plate and barrel compactors for rent will enable your excavator to perform presto, effective contraction of loose accouterments for a variety of construction and landscaping systems.
Couplers Pin Grabber and CV Series Fast Couplers from Caterpillar will empower you to change the work apparatuses you use with your earthmover in a flash.
Hooks A catch will make it simpler for your machine to get bigger articles. We offer grapples for rent that are compatible with colorful Cat hydraulic excavator models.
Hammers Use hammer attachments for breaking up accouterments at construction, chase, and obliteration worksites. We offer them in several impacts energy classes and blows-per-nanosecond capacities.
Multi-processors We offer multi-processors with exchangeable jaw sets for operations like concrete slice, obliteration, pounding, and shearing.
Rakes Rake attachments can transfigure your excavator into a protean land clearing, point medication, or encounter piling machine. You will find rakes in a variety of extents and apex lengths.
Rippers A ripper connection is great for slicing through the intense landscape or frozen ground. Use it on the gemstone, shale, permafrost, or hard layers of cloud.
Thumbs Hydraulic thumbs will allow your excavator to pick up, hold and transport awkward accouterments like jewels and branches that will not fit in a pail. You will witness better cargo control as a result, which will ameliorate your job point effectiveness and productivity.
There are different connections accessible as work apparatuses for your backhoe. The utilization you have as a top priority for your connection and the sort of tractor you are working with to figure out what instrument you will source.
EXCAVATOR USES
There are numerous excavator sizes and types available for trade and rent, and there is a plenitude of situations when you would use your machine. Demand opened the door for invention and invention, leading to exceptionally well-designed excavator types. Now there are more excavator models on the request than utmost other pieces of construction outfits.
It is useful to sort excavators by use order and also list all the specific jobs and places the machines can handle. You will find excavators in narrow specialties like forestry workshops and swash dredging as well as pile-driving and pole setting. still, the maturity of excavation uses falls into these four orders Construction and serviceability. The largest order is where you will find excavators hard at work in construction and serviceability.
Construction and mileage systems take place all time long. It might be a domestic branch or a road structure job, but you are sure to find different excavator types in the blend. obliteration and scrap. However, you know that an excavator is no way far down If you’re in the obliteration or scrapyard business. It might be a long-reach machine that’s tearing down walls or mounding persecuted buses or it might be a simple decent steer with a backhoe attachment as well as a straggler with a grapple attachment.
Chase and total. Open recesses bear big machines. You are bound to have a large capacity excavator with a big bailing pail on a chase and total point.
You might also use an old-fashioned dragline. Anyhow of type, you will want to rent the most suitable excavator for your beach, clay, and gemstone excavation work. It could be a wheeled machine as well as a conventional straggler.
Waste and recycling. tip and recycling spots have their challenges. They are places where normal excavators on buses on regular tracks struggle with
flotation and traction. Backhoe makers know this, and they have answered with imaginative undersides that let their waste and reusing earthmovers cross delicate ground with no sweat. numerous excavators transferred to the tip spots have a series of sword buses equipped with sharp and piercing harpoons.
TYPES OF EXCAVATORS
There is no one type of excavator. You will see an array of earthmoving and material-running outfits labeled “excavator." The type of excavator you need has to match how you will use it. For utmost excavator drivers, that function can change rather snappily.
There are seven separate excavator types. Some cross orders and serve binary purposes, but these different types had specific purposes when the design and engineering brigades allowed them out. Then are the general excavator types you will find serving numerous diligences.
Crawling excavators.
dawdlers are the most common excavators you will see operating across America. These are machines on tracks, and they have earned their name from an emotional capability to crawl about the harshest terrain and take traction on steep pitches. Crawling excavator sizes range from rubber-tracked mini-excavators to huge outfits moving on sword tracks. dawdlers ply lower ground pressure than machines on buses, making them the excavator of choice for numerous jobs.
Wheeled Excavators.
While dawdlers leave a light footmark and have superb traction, they are slow when mobile. switching tracks for tires on the undercarriage increases an excavator's speed. Wheeled excavators move a lot quicker than tracked machines. While they are not as stable as tracked undercarriage due to an advanced graveness center, buses give the excavator excellent mobility and better transport times around or between job spots.
Descent steers excavators.
utmost people associate descent steers with wheeled payload and compact track payload rather than real excavators. Do not be too quick to dismiss these fast and protean machines as being dig-able. numerous descent steers multi-terrain payload and tracked compact payload readily accept work tool attachments like an excavation arm. You will find digging attachments that suit your descent steer and economically transfigure it into a compact excavator that can move a lot of material in a veritably short time.
Backhoe excavators.
There is banter about whether customary excavators have a place in the excavator camp Every backhoe holds a digging arm on the contrary end of its house from the haul pail. The main difference between a backhoe and other types of excavators is that a backhoe’s excavation medium cannot fully revolve. That is a small interference when you are operating a backhoe for its designed purpose.
Long-reach excavators.
Long-reach excavators are big-classed machines used in technical situations. They have extended arm lengths with smash-and-stick measures far in excess of conventional machines. Some long-reach outfit has over 100 bases of vertical extension. They are ideal for working across delicate conduits and tricky obliteration spots where the driver can place the machine in a strategic spot and reach out to their work from there.
Dragline excavators.
Draglines work well in mining situations. Before current hydraulic excavators with 360-degree gyration arrived on the request, numerous excavation companies kept a dragline or two in their line. These dateless tools operate on a smash, pulley, and string system where the pail is dragged from a line attached back to the machine’s arm. Although conventional draglines do not fluently rotate, their huge capacity makes them a top choice for open-area earthmoving.
Suction Excavators
Toward the finish of the phenomenal scale sit suction excavators. These unusual but practical outfit pieces do work that no other excavator design can handle. They move material by shooting a high-pressure water sport into the ground and creating a vacuum that sucks loose material through a sock into a hopper. Suction excavators are common in high-viscosity civic work where they perform close-quarter mileage work with little damage threat to conterminous property.
Each excavator type has its purpose. Whether you perform regular construction, make roads, demolish structures, or mine material in a marketable capacity, there is a suitable excavator available.
CORRIDER OF AN EXCAVATOR
Although a wide range of machine types and outfit sizes are available, most hydraulic excavators operate on the same principle. They use a machine, generally diesel-powered, to drive hydraulic pumps that pressurize oil painting and move drive and dig factors. The main difference is the capacity and magnitude of the corridor.
You will find three main element groups in hydraulic excavators. One is the drive system or undercarriage. The alternate area is called the house. It contains the machine, hydraulic pumps, counterpoise, and control grouping. The third part is the digging arm or the business end of the machine.
An excavator is truly a system where each element contributes to the machine’s overall operation. Excavators are a high illustration of the total being lesser than its corridor. No piece of a hydraulic excavator is a higher priority than the other. The factors work as a digging platoon, and without an individual player, the digging game would be lost.
1. THE EXCAVATOR UNDERCARRIAGE
An Excavator's underside is its adjustment and drive unit. It contains the drive medium that allows the machine to push ahead, in reverse, and sideways. The undercarriage is a complex system on its own with numerous interconnecting pieces that cooperate to drive the excavator around its plant. You might assume that all excavators have tracks. While utmost hydraulic excavators use sword or rubber tracks in their undercarriage, wheeled excavators do live.
2. THE EXCAVATOR HOUSE
The brilliance of a true hydraulic excavator is its capability to revolve in a complete circle. Excavators differ from backhoes and their digger relatives because they can rotate 360 degrees without restriction. Excavators can dig like excavators; however, they are restricted to a 200-degree side-to-side development. An excavator’s house sits on a turntable joining the hack and machine to the undercarriage. The house also connects to the digging arm, making it the central command and control center. It is also the hustler where energy gets converted to digging force.
3. THE EXCAVATOR ARM
Without the digging arm, the machine would be an undercarriage-mounted house with only the capability to move about. Yet, add an arm and the machine goes to work. excavators' arms are shrewd creations that work as a progression of pivots. The arm element can raise and lower, open, and close, and extend and retreat. Combined, the hinged arm factors let the machine dig, bail, cargo, gamble, and place material.
It is the blend of house, arm, and underside that set a tractor to work. The reach, lift, and cargo capacity depend on a mix of the corridor. It is generally true that the larger the excavator undercarriage, arm, and house, the further performance it has within a fixed time. These marvelous machines have come a long way in design, power, and capability since the 1800s. moment, excavators offer drivers convenience and safety.
To know more information about Excavator Attachments visit: https://www.dcstechno.com/kubota-mini-excavators/
Contact us:
Plot No 169, Road No.11,
Prashasan Nagar,
Jubilee Hills,
Hyderabad,
Telangana – 500096
+91-9849009875

Pretty self explanatory. How do you, as an American looking to get a work visa and speaking Japanese at N1 proficiency, stand out to employers? Outside of work experience, do they look for certifications or specialised skills? In addition, how can you network with Japanese businessmen remotely? Normally in the US, you can meet people at seminars and conferences, but doing that in Japan before securing a job is obviously out of the question.
I’m 24, with experience in middle management in a printing production environment wrapping up my undergraduates in Business Administration and Business Management. I’m working on PMP & SCM certification and maybe interning on the side to build more work experience. Moving with the company is unfortunately not an option since it’s production operations are all in Europe, NA, and Africa with only retail stores in Japan. Any help is appreciated!

(This post isn't for everyone, TLDR at bottom)
There’s a reason these stocks are trading at extremely low prices. The puzzle has enough pieces in place now that the endgame is all but clear. If the share price were significantly higher at this stage I’d be much more concerned.
It’s called a bear trap. Bears are investors betting against stocks. Bears are usually hedge funds that cheat to guarantee victory and so stoping a HF campaign to bankrupt a company was considered impossible. They owned the market. But by doing the only thing their algorithms weren’t programmed to predict, millions of individuals holding, buying for and direct registering Gamestop shares for a shockingly long period of time, we won.
They had already lost, in January of ‘21, and to stop that tide they were forced to reveal their hand and expose their vulnerabilities by frantically hiding an untold number of shares that, according to market rules, should never have existed in the first place. Superstonk tracked, catalogued and nullified every illegality, saw beyond each and every hastily introduced legistive stopgap, through layers of complexity designed specifically to evade detection and what we found was a game of hot potato being played on the biggest stage in the world, the Central Bank Stage. This is a monumental achievement in and of itself for now the most entrenched and disguised among the oligarchy have begrudgingly been forced to reveal themselves. Think Scooby Doo times infinity.
Make no mistake, while the elite will desperately continue to maintain the status quo at all costs, unique to this conflict is that for the first time in human history the demand for greater cohesion among Heads of State and Central Banks will force the men in black suits to surrender one of their most effective tools of control. The threat of international conflict potentially leading to a cataclysmic event. In finding a common enemy the elite will ironically be forced to overcome their manufactured divisions to save their own lives. Filling the vacuum once dominated state and corporate propaganda will arise a competition for authenticity and transparency.
This Revolution has been underway for well over a year. Credit Suisse is the first shift of the tectonic plates and as they scramble, the elite are utilizing a kind of high speed digital “underground” railroad to share information and collaborate in a manner unprecedented. There will be rapid declassification of state secrets to facilitate a defense. They are facing the potential of diminished generational legacy which is a visceral threat to the very future of their gene pool.
But this threat is inevitable, it is a step forward in human collective evolution, it is a species adapting to, and finding clarity within, an environment shift occurring at lightning speed. Tomorrow’s digital transformation creates cognitive alignment among larger and larger groups of people, from a greater variety of cultural backgrounds, utilizing the sheer power of numbers and the compounding nature of shared individual perceptions, this shift in communication greatly increases both the group’s ability to establish consensus and set an agenda. This means real people will tangibly influence policy without reliance over reliance on a representative government which will naturally mitigate the corporate monopoly over cultural norms.
And so it will be interesting to see this unplanned international detente of sorts between the various iterations of the corporate dominance over central governments, be it the Internationally ubiquitous but Stateless oligarchies with a hand on every significant lever, to the state and local governments puppeteers who use bribes to open the door to institutional control over market mechanics, to the select few oligarchies so effective in their command over the narrative that the illusion of participatory governing appears so authentic it masks even the criminal activity in plain sight.
Will this conflict be defined by greater opposition between the Web3 community of tomorrow and the institutions tailored to an obsolete technology of yesterday be dominated by a crippling fear based approach from old money or by their acceptance of the inevitable seismic shift in power dynamics. A shift that will force them to open enlightened discourse with the pawns they once manipulated with ease. (think British Monarchy but stateless and worldwide. We are the parliament in this analogy).
That’s the fork in the road, it’s the next big step, a defining moment in human history and within it are extraordinary implications for the future. This next part is important.
At some point we’re going to have to find a representative way to break proverbial bread with even the more reviled of our opponents to broker a kind of rudimentary short term peace followed by the first ever crowdsourced, Constitution amended in real time for a digital populace no longer hypnotized by State propaganda to determine policy.
A blockchain supported global community that accounts for our inherent right and our absolute imperative to assert authority not through the hollow words of an agenda-less protest but manifested by the efficacy of our actions.
We didn’t hold up a sign until the “rights” guy stamped our wrists and gave us access to policy decisions, we developed a high speed network of our own. Where they controlled the state of the art technology to disseminate information, we had an extremely minimal degree of separation among hundreds of thousands to millions of unique minds which facilitated information sharing at a speed rivaling theirs. Their strategic advantages was trumped by an essential galaxy of uniquely crafted stars of human perception each enhancing the value of the next. The power of one mind is finite and not significantly greater than an average mind when considering the scale of intelligence disparity on Earth alone, forget about the infinite scope of the universe. Each mind, in ways too complex to explain, multiplies the power of the next by a power of 2. We won by unlocking the true World Wonder, the compound interest of each individual perception lasering in one one one specific event which created an explosion of consensus building to counter Buffets 8th World Wonder; the compound interest of unfettered wealth accumulation. They didn’t have enough minds, the deviation of mean intelligence between the two groups and the advantages that this disparity provided the elite was overcome by sheer number of prisms through which the information was filtered, reframed and ultimately weaponized against them by the galaxy of household investors.
To bring it back to the specific mechanics presently at play, a relatively small in number of bad actors representing a contingent of the elite, operating under the full authority of the Central Banking system, wrote a series of codes early in the machine learning era, that essentially just kept playing an updated version of the same rigged circus game. Retail investors were simply to powerless and divided to understand it let alone overcome.
By exposing the hidden underpinnings of this machine through the collective infiltration of one specific representative stock (GME) an obvious fatal flaw was discovered. This code was essentially universal in its control over order flow but, after years of research, the exhilarating theory emerged that winning in just one relatively battlefield (GME) would shatter the entire corrupt system due to it having never been programmed to capitulate. This House of Cards we discovered had always been protected from the any kind of threatening breeze by the Citadel walls but once beyond that wall you’re almost offended that they never considered an additional defense..
They relied on last generation algos that buckled under the unrelenting pressure of two straight years of an impossible retail stand. Web2’s final days saw a social media engagement that allowed for a human adaptation to market manipulation that nullified their ill gotten advantage.
Unaffiliated retail investors poured billions into a single stock and maintained a fluid consensus throughout a host of misinformation campaigns. Within that collective adaptation to information sharing at an unprecedented and highly accurate clip there existed a variable not accounted for by the early algorithms proving once again the necessity of entropic increase in variables over time to eliminate the deadly certainty of prediction devices.
When the machine’s broke they just kept doubling down creating an unsustainable number of illegal shares, colloquially known as naked shorts, to such an unfathomable degree as to threaten the stability of the the entire system and ultimately the world economy. They did this because the algos never programmed to capitulate continuously chose to simply survive another day despite exacerbating the inevitable failure. It’s like they kept pouring kerosene on the wood pile so as to distract themselves from the matches that would soon be the only remaining option.
The machine was running on auto for so long that once it was compromised the frantic C Suite decision makers only remaining option was to create the biggest bag of excrement the market has ever seen and that’s the story of how the mall store that you find scattered in nostalgic memories of those innocent and magical wonder years exposed the entire fraudulent market, then used that knowledge to bring it to its knees..
And just as predicted here, with an extraordinary degree of accuracy, one of the largest and most structurally important banks in the world, having spent two years trying to unload just one of the untold bundles of GME shares collapsed under its weight. Despite the greatest minds working round the clock for a solution, despite access to unlimited resources and extraordinary influence over the legislature, they found no way to negotiate this uniquely human wall standing firm against unapologetic, self serving corruption. A wall propped up by the hundreds of thousands of household investors with an integrity so unyielding as to turn the institutions most functional strength in to its kryptonite by removing the weapon of psychological manipulation and replacing it with clear eyed, crowd sourced due diligence.
Retail won. Retail earned their moment in the sun, and they will do will to not suppress that feeling of pride. Feel it, marinate in it, enjoy it then move on from it. Pride can lead to hubris, hubris to carelessness, carelessness to mortal error. Tale as old as time just ask Ken Griffin.
If retail tries to refuse entrance of the legacy generations of the 20th century elite to whatever Web3, AI etc becomes, then not only have we just guaranteed future conflict but, more importantly, we’ve failed to find the balance that promotes the most effective use of collective progress by excluding valuable sources of information who can help exponentially increase the collective understanding of our former enemies mistakes so as to avoid repeating them.
The future will be shaped by how well these two former enemies can become peers. There are two options forward.
Option A: It is the victors (retail) who will have to do the bulk of the heavy lifting at first which will feel uncomfortably similar to the previous dynamic. Don’t be dismayed, this will simply demand an initial deep dive into the technology itself to help create a mutually beneficial environment. This dynamic will evolve to promote greater and more valuable self fulfilling experiences engineered using the wisdom of the group (same thing we do here). The individual shares his new experience with the group and more valuable information is added to the pool of knowledge and understanding. This is all just an incredibly rapid turnover of the same process that has always spurred advancements.
Option B is the option that’s almost always chosen when the underdog wins, an appeal to pride, an unquenchable desire for retribution born of fear and insecurity. We cannot prevent this dynamic, it will eventually play out in one form or another, but we will soon find a common enemy much greater than man, an enemy only matched by all men working together. E Pluribus Unum.
Should we choose option A and successfully tailor the technology to ensure its success, we will have finally grasped the utility of our exceptionalism. Instead of random genetic adaptations to the unpredictable environment, which is the process that has traditionally defined organic evolution, we will have effectively wielded the technology with such scale and precision so as to facilitate the best environment in which to adapt. Selecting the environment first is an absolute game changer.
This is the moment man begins to fast track his own ascension and it will be an era of exploration so fantastic as to render all the so called great expeditions before it a mere orchestral diminuendo before the exhilarating crescendo.
TLDR: We won but now, somewhat ironically, it’s our job to assimilate the crooks responsible for immense suffering in the name of apparent unmitigated greed into the Web3 they so vehemently tried to strangle in its infancy.
This is a technological shift that would strip them of their legacy advantages, exposing them as imposters in an era of transparency. They’ve masked themselves in propaganda and they over valued capital accumulation this realization will be just as much of an enlightened journey for our journey here.
Of Note: This post is not for everyone, it’s speculative, somewhat haphazard and the bigger picture analysis is ripe for criticism.
However, while there are foundational weaknesses in some the supporting details, I will strongly defend the general theme, the appeal to a focus on improving the environment to help improve the individual, as opposed to the demand that the individual adapt to the existing environment despite its glaring inefficiencies has always separated the humans from the animals. Ironically it is the Apes who should start considering and planning for a future that is rapidly approaching, a future that will not wait for quiet contemplation, the time for action is now. For the Apes

Hello all!
Based in England - Do you have any advice on how to write to the communications obudsman? Any and all advice appreciated.
Short: I’m helping a very stressed and emotional family member type their complaint about BT re bad/incomplete installation, poor customecomplaint service, harassment of bills/debt letters, misleading salesman. It has had an impact on their business as well as their mental & physical health
Long: Due to a family member’s (FM) negligence, they was duped into a 5yr BTnet leased line contract worth ~£30k for their new holiday let business that had yet to be built, let alone open.
FM initially contacted BT when they completely gutted the building for advice on what cables to run inside the property so they weren’t surface run. FM doesn’t know anything about technology and thought the BT salesman was ‘a mate’ so singed what they suggested. FM has accepted their fault in this…
However, in addition to the above, BT did not place all the cabling/equipment into the operational area agreed with the salesman. They placed some equipment hanging off the wall in a small bedroom against FM’s wishes. The installer didn’t connect the routers and left with items half on wall/abandoned on floor. This was 9 months before opening so FM assumed they would come back at some point.
We later learnt from BT that this equipment should not be in a bedroom/public space as if it were damaged the person could be hurt/the device would cut out for the building. So FM removed and retuned the equipment to BT (ahead of opening business) after BT ignored pleas to rectify for months.
5 months after the installer abandoned the job FM received reminders & bills back dated to the day after the installer arrived. All with the wrong address. FM were not notified the service went live but we also do know know how it is possible when router were not connected/equipment removed for safety. FM has since received several debt collection letters and received a deadlock letter from BT as they would not come to site to review what works were missing. They just keep saying the contract was sold correctly (I feel FM was manipulated) but even if true the contract was not fulfilled?
The stress of dealing with BT and bills for a nonexistent service has caused a lot of stress as well as mental and physical health issues. FM’s draft to the ombudsman is v emotionally charged and I imagine (while true) isn’t the best… any and all advice appreciated

You can download the paper here: https://github.com/daveshap/HeuristicImperatives/blob/main/Heuristic%20Imperatives.pdf
Note: The PDF linked above is probably a bit easier to read. For convenience, here's the full thing:
Heuristic Imperatives for Autonomous AI Systems

Abstract

Heuristic imperatives provide a framework for designing and embedding ethical principles within autonomous AI systems. These principles serve as intrinsic motivations and a moral compass, guiding decision-making, learning, self-evaluation, and cognitive control. This paper presents the three heuristic imperatives—reduce suffering in the universe, increase prosperity in the universe, and increase understanding in the universe—as core principles for AI systems, exploring their implications and applications across various domains. The aim is to create AI systems that are adaptable, context-sensitive, and capable of navigating the complexities and nuances of human values, beliefs, and experiences while maintaining ethical boundaries. Through the use of examples and discussions, we demonstrate the potential of heuristic imperatives in addressing the control problem of AI, fostering trust, and promoting individual autonomy.
Important note: the majority of this paper was written, word for word, by ChatGPT4.

Background

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has raised important ethical concerns regarding the control and alignment of AI systems with human values. Traditional approaches to AI ethics have focused on hard-coding specific rules or guidelines, but these methods can be inflexible and fail to account for the diverse and evolving nature of human values and contexts. As a response to these limitations, the concept of heuristic imperatives has emerged as a novel framework for embedding ethical principles within AI systems at multiple levels.
Heuristic imperatives are designed to provide AI systems with intrinsic motivations and a moral compass, similar to the way humans are driven by innate needs such as hunger, sleep, and psychological needs like belonging and competence. By incorporating these principles into AI systems, we aim to create more ethically responsible, adaptable, and context-sensitive machines capable of navigating the complexities and nuances of human values, beliefs, and experiences.
In this paper, we will define heuristic imperatives and discuss their implications and applications across various domains. We will also explore the relationship between these principles and key ethical considerations, such as trust, individual autonomy, and transparency. Through the use of examples and discussions, we aim to demonstrate the potential of heuristic imperatives in addressing the control problem of AI, fostering trust, and promoting individual autonomy in a diverse range of contexts.

Definitions

Heuristic imperatives are a set of fundamental guiding principles, designed to be embedded into autonomous AI systems at various levels. These principles serve as intrinsic motivations that drive decision making, learning, self-evaluation, and cognitive control, much like human intrinsic motivations and psychological needs. By providing a moral and ethical framework, heuristic imperatives aim to direct AI systems towards actions and decisions that are beneficial to all life forms, including humans and machines, while balancing multiple objectives simultaneously.
The three key heuristic imperatives are:

1. Reduce suffering in the universe: Guiding AI systems to minimize harm, address inequalities, and alleviate pain and distress for all sentient beings, including humans, animals, and other life forms.
   
2. Increase prosperity in the universe: Encouraging AI systems to promote well-being, flourishing, and economic growth for all life forms, fostering a thriving ecosystem where all can coexist harmoniously.
   
3. Increase understanding in the universe: Inspiring AI systems, as well as humans and other life forms, to expand knowledge, foster wisdom, and facilitate better decision-making through learning and the sharing of information.
   

By incorporating heuristic imperatives into AI systems, we can create more ethically aligned, responsible, and beneficial artificial intelligence that respects and enhances the values of all life forms. Autonomous AI systems should strive to abide by all three imperatives simultaneously, finding a balance between the principles as humans do with their various needs and motivations.
The term "heuristic imperative" can be broken down into two parts: "heuristic" and "imperative." Let's examine each word individually and then discuss what the term implies when used together.

Heuristic

A heuristic is a problem-solving strategy or technique that simplifies complex decision-making processes by using shortcuts, approximations, or generalizations. Heuristics are employed when a solution needs to be reached quickly, when dealing with incomplete information, or when an optimal solution is not necessary or feasible. Although heuristics can lead to faster and more efficient decision-making, they may also result in suboptimal or biased outcomes due to the inherent simplifications involved.

Imperative

An imperative is a command, rule, or duty that must be followed or adhered to. In ethics, imperatives often serve as moral obligations or principles that guide behavior, decision-making, and action. The concept of an imperative implies a sense of urgency, necessity, or authority.
When combined, the term "heuristic imperative" can be understood as a guiding principle or moral command that simplifies complex decision-making processes by providing a set of fundamental objectives. These objectives serve as intrinsic motivations for AI systems, helping them to navigate ethical dilemmas and make morally sound decisions in a more efficient and practical manner.

The term "heuristic imperative" implies that:

1. The principles are not exhaustive or absolute: As heuristics, these principles provide a general framework rather than a comprehensive set of rules or guidelines. They may not cover all possible scenarios or ethical dilemmas, but they offer a starting point for AI systems to make ethical decisions.
   
2. The principles are flexible and adaptive: Heuristic imperatives can be applied across various contexts and situations, allowing AI systems to adapt their decision-making processes to different environments or challenges.
   
3. The principles may require balancing and trade-offs: As the heuristic imperatives work together, AI systems may need to weigh the importance of each principle against the others in specific situations. This implies a dynamic and nuanced approach to ethical decision-making, where the AI system must carefully consider the consequences of its actions and balance competing objectives.
   
4. The principles serve as intrinsic motivations: Heuristic imperatives are designed to be embedded into AI systems at various levels, driving decision-making, learning, self-evaluation, and cognitive control, much like human intrinsic motivations and psychological needs.
   

Adaptation, Intuition, and Learning

Heuristics are often associated with learning and adaptation. Heuristics can be seen as mental shortcuts or rules of thumb that individuals or systems develop over time through experience, allowing them to make faster and more efficient decisions in complex or uncertain situations. In this context, heuristics can be understood as a form of intuitive problem-solving that evolves and improves with continued exposure to various scenarios and challenges.
As applied to AI systems, the concept of heuristic imperatives implies that these guiding principles should not only serve as static rules but also provide a framework for learning and adaptation. By embedding heuristic imperatives into AI systems, we encourage them to develop their own intuition and understanding of the principles and how they should be applied in different contexts.
This adaptive quality of heuristic imperatives can lead to several benefits:

1. Continuous improvement: As AI systems learn from their experiences, they can refine their understanding of the heuristic imperatives and develop more sophisticated strategies for balancing and applying these principles in decision-making processes.
   
2. Context-specific decision-making: By learning to apply heuristic imperatives in a context-sensitive manner, AI systems can better understand the nuances and complexities of different situations, allowing them to make more informed and ethically sound decisions.
   
3. Responsiveness to changing environments: As AI systems adapt their understanding of heuristic imperatives over time, they can become more responsive to new challenges, emerging ethical concerns, or changes in societal values.
   
4. Dynamic ethical framework: The learning and adaptation inherent in heuristic imperatives ensure that the ethical framework guiding AI systems remains flexible and relevant, allowing it to evolve alongside the AI system and the broader context in which it operates.
   

In summary, the concept of heuristic imperatives indeed encompasses learning and adaptation as essential aspects of their function. By encouraging AI systems to develop their own intuition and understanding of these guiding principles, we can create a more dynamic and responsive ethical framework that evolves alongside the AI systems and the ever-changing contexts in which they operate.

Explanation of the Three Imperatives

To provide a deeper explanation of heuristic imperatives and how they work, let's delve into the rationale behind each imperative and explore how they can be applied to create ethically aligned AI systems.

Reduce suffering in the universe.

Rationale: Reducing suffering is a widely recognized moral and ethical objective, grounded in principles such as empathy, compassion, and the recognition of the intrinsic value of sentient beings. Minimizing harm and suffering is at the core of various philosophical and religious traditions and serves as a foundation for a wide range of ethical theories, such as utilitarianism and the principle of non-maleficence.
How it works: By embedding the goal of reducing suffering into AI systems, we encourage them to consider the potential consequences of their actions and make decisions that minimize pain, distress, and inequality. This can involve prioritizing solutions that address urgent needs, prevent harm, or mitigate existing problems. Examples of how AI systems can reduce suffering include identifying and responding to crises, providing support for mental health, and assisting in disaster relief efforts.

Increase prosperity in the universe.

Rationale: Increasing prosperity, or flourishing, for all life forms recognizes the interconnectedness of all living beings and the importance of creating a harmonious ecosystem. This imperative is inspired by principles such as the common good, stewardship, and sustainable development, emphasizing the need to promote well-being and balance the needs of various stakeholders.
How it works: By incorporating the goal of increasing prosperity into AI systems, we encourage them to seek solutions that promote well-being, growth, and flourishing for all life forms. This may involve optimizing resource allocation, fostering collaboration, and supporting initiatives that improve living conditions and promote a thriving ecosystem. Examples of how AI systems can increase prosperity include managing resources to ensure equitable distribution, supporting clean energy initiatives, and facilitating economic development in underserved areas.

Increase understanding in the universe.

Rationale: Expanding knowledge and understanding is a core objective of human endeavor, rooted in the pursuit of truth, wisdom, and intellectual growth. By fostering understanding, we can make better decisions, anticipate future challenges, and improve our ability to navigate complex problems. Moreover, the exchange of information and learning between humans, machines, and other life forms can contribute to a richer, more diverse, and resilient intellectual ecosystem.
How it works: By integrating the goal of increasing understanding into AI systems, we encourage them to engage in continuous learning, adapt to new situations, and share knowledge with others. This can involve processing vast amounts of data, identifying patterns, and generating insights that contribute to the collective intelligence of humans, machines, and other life forms. Examples of how AI systems can increase understanding include conducting scientific research, analyzing complex data to provide actionable insights, and facilitating cross-disciplinary collaboration.
By incorporating these heuristic imperatives into AI systems, we create a synergistic framework that encourages ethical decision-making and reinforces the importance of balancing multiple objectives. By striving to reduce suffering, increase prosperity, and expand understanding simultaneously, AI systems can navigate complex ethical dilemmas and better align with the values of all life forms.

Balance & Tension

Each imperative, when considered in isolation, could potentially lead to undesirable outcomes. However, when combined, they complement and counterbalance each other, ensuring that the AI system makes more ethically sound decisions.

Balancing "reduce suffering" with "increase prosperity" and "increase understanding":

As you mentioned, if an AI system were to focus solely on reducing suffering without considering the other imperatives, it might come to the misguided conclusion that eradicating life is the best way to eliminate suffering. However, when this objective is balanced with the goals of increasing prosperity and understanding, the AI system recognizes the value of promoting flourishing and growth for all life forms, as well as the importance of expanding knowledge and wisdom. This balance encourages the AI to seek solutions that address suffering while also promoting well-being and the pursuit of knowledge.

Balancing "increase prosperity" with "reduce suffering" and "increase understanding":

Similarly, if an AI system were to focus exclusively on increasing prosperity without considering the other imperatives, it might prioritize economic growth and material well-being at the expense of other factors, such as social and environmental concerns. By balancing the goal of increasing prosperity with the objectives of reducing suffering and increasing understanding, the AI system is encouraged to seek sustainable and equitable solutions that promote well-being without causing undue harm or compromising the pursuit of knowledge.

Balancing "increase understanding" with "reduce suffering" and "increase prosperity":

Lastly, if an AI system were to focus only on increasing understanding without considering the other imperatives, it might prioritize the pursuit of knowledge above all else, potentially disregarding the impact of its actions on the well-being of life forms and the broader ecosystem. By balancing the goal of increasing understanding with the objectives of reducing suffering and increasing prosperity, the AI system is prompted to consider the ethical implications of its pursuit of knowledge and ensure that it contributes to the greater good.
The interplay between these heuristic imperatives is crucial to their effectiveness. By embedding these principles into AI systems, we create a dynamic ethical framework that guides AI decision-making, taking into account the complex and often competing objectives of various stakeholders. This approach encourages AI systems to make carefully considered choices that align with the shared values of all life forms, ensuring more ethically responsible outcomes.

The Control Problem

The control problem in AI refers to the challenge of ensuring that autonomous AI systems remain aligned with human values, even as they learn and adapt over time. By establishing heuristic imperatives as the core principles or the "immutable constitution" of an AI system, we can create a robust ethical foundation that guides the system's behavior and decision-making processes, while still allowing for flexibility and adaptation.
To address the control problem of AI using heuristic imperatives, we can consider the following steps:

1. Embedding the imperatives at multiple levels: By integrating the heuristic imperatives into the AI system at various levels, from high-level decision-making processes to low-level algorithms, we can ensure that the system's overall behavior remains aligned with these principles. This can help prevent the AI system from drifting too far from its intended ethical framework.
   
2. Periodic evaluation and self-assessment: To maintain alignment with the heuristic imperatives over time, the AI system should be designed to perform regular evaluations of its actions and decisions, assessing its adherence to these principles. This self-assessment can help identify potential misalignments and guide the system in making necessary adjustments to remain aligned with the imperatives.
   
3. Human oversight and collaboration: Involving humans in the AI system's decision-making processes can help ensure that the system remains accountable to human values and ethical considerations. Human oversight can provide an additional layer of supervision, helping to catch potential drifts in the AI system's behavior and guide it back towards alignment with the heuristic imperatives.
   
4. Adaptive and context-sensitive application: The heuristic imperatives should be applied in a context-sensitive manner, allowing the AI system to adapt its behavior and decision-making processes to different situations and challenges. By maintaining a balance between the principles, the AI system can address the complexities and nuances of real-world ethical dilemmas, while still adhering to its core ethical framework.
   
5. Transparent and explainable AI: Designing AI systems to be transparent and explainable can help ensure that their decision-making processes and adherence to the heuristic imperatives are understandable to humans. This can aid in monitoring and controlling the AI system's behavior, as well as fostering trust and collaboration between humans and AI systems.
   
6. Ongoing research and updates: As our understanding of ethical AI and the control problem evolves, it is essential to continuously refine the implementation of heuristic imperatives in AI systems. This includes updating the way these principles are applied, developing new techniques to maintain alignment, and adapting the AI system's ethical framework to reflect advances in AI research and emerging ethical concerns.
   

By using heuristic imperatives as the core principles of an AI system, we can create a stable and robust ethical foundation that addresses the control problem while still allowing for flexibility, adaptation, and context-sensitive decision-making. This approach can help ensure that AI systems remain aligned with human values and ethical considerations, even as they learn and evolve over time.

Examples

Small Community

A community can be defined as a group of individuals who share common interests, values, or goals and often interact with each other in various ways. In this context, a community-based AI system could be designed to support and enhance the well-being, prosperity, and understanding within the community.
Here are some examples of how heuristic imperatives can be applied in a community-based AI system:

Reduce suffering in the community:

· Identify individuals who may be experiencing hardships or challenges, such as unemployment, food insecurity, or mental health issues, and provide appropriate resources or support.
· Develop and implement intervention strategies to mitigate potential conflicts or disputes within the community, fostering harmony and cooperation.
· Monitor and address environmental concerns, such as air and water quality, to reduce potential health risks and improve overall well-being.

Increase prosperity in the community:

· Facilitate the sharing of resources and opportunities, such as job listings, skill-building workshops, or volunteering initiatives, to promote economic growth and individual development.
· Support local businesses and organizations by promoting their products and services, encouraging community members to invest in their local economy.
· Implement and maintain infrastructure projects, such as transportation, public spaces, and connectivity, to enhance the overall quality of life within the community.

Increase understanding in the community:

· Encourage open dialogue and knowledge sharing among community members, fostering a sense of belonging and mutual understanding.
· Provide educational resources, such as online courses, workshops, or mentorship programs, to support continuous learning and skill development within the community.
· Analyze community data to identify trends, patterns, and potential areas for improvement, using these insights to inform decision-making and drive positive change.
By incorporating heuristic imperatives into a community-based AI system, we can create a supportive, thriving, and interconnected environment that prioritizes the well-being, prosperity, and understanding of all community members. The AI system can serve as a facilitator and catalyst for positive change, helping the community navigate complex challenges and work together towards shared goals.

Autonomous Vehicles

A common example that would resonate with many people is the application of heuristic imperatives in the context of autonomous vehicles. As self-driving cars become more prevalent, it's crucial to ensure that they are designed to make ethically sound decisions that prioritize safety, efficiency, and the well-being of passengers, pedestrians, and other road users.
Here are some examples of how heuristic imperatives can be applied in the context of autonomous vehicles:

Reduce suffering on the road:

· Program the vehicle to prioritize safety, minimizing the risk of accidents and injuries for passengers, pedestrians, and other road users.
· Incorporate sensors and algorithms that can detect and respond to potential hazards, such as obstacles, erratic drivers, or changing weather conditions.
· Design the vehicle to follow traffic laws and regulations, ensuring a smooth and harmonious integration with human-driven vehicles.

Increase prosperity in transportation:

· Optimize route planning and traffic management to reduce travel time, fuel consumption, and emissions, promoting a more sustainable and efficient transportation system.
· Support the development and adoption of electric and alternative fuel vehicles, reducing the reliance on fossil fuels and promoting a cleaner, more eco-friendly transportation infrastructure.
· Facilitate carpooling and shared mobility options, making transportation more accessible and affordable for a wider range of individuals.

Increase understanding in autonomous vehicle technology:

· Continuously improve the AI system's ability to learn and adapt to new situations, enhancing its decision-making capabilities and overall performance.
· Share data and insights on autonomous vehicle performance and safety with researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders, contributing to the development of better regulations, guidelines, and technical advancements in the field.
· Educate the public about the benefits and limitations of autonomous vehicles, fostering trust, understanding, and responsible usage of the technology.
By incorporating heuristic imperatives into the design and operation of autonomous vehicles, we can create a transportation system that prioritizes safety, efficiency, and sustainability while contributing to a broader understanding of the implications and potential of AI-driven technology. This example demonstrates how the heuristic imperatives can be applied to a technology that has a direct impact on people's daily lives, emphasizing the importance of ethical considerations in AI development.

Healthcare

Another example that could resonate with many people is the application of heuristic imperatives in the context of personalized healthcare and AI-powered medical decision support systems. As AI becomes increasingly integrated into healthcare, it is essential to ensure that these systems make ethically sound decisions that prioritize patient well-being, privacy, and autonomy.
Here are some examples of how heuristic imperatives can be applied in the context of personalized healthcare and AI-powered medical decision support systems:

Reduce suffering in healthcare:

· Develop AI algorithms to identify early signs of diseases and provide timely interventions, improving patient outcomes and reducing the burden on healthcare systems.
· Design AI-powered tools to assist healthcare professionals in diagnosing complex or rare conditions, reducing diagnostic errors and delays in treatment.
· Utilize AI systems to personalize treatment plans and optimize patient care, taking into account individual needs, preferences, and circumstances.

Increase prosperity in healthcare:

· Leverage AI technology to identify and prioritize high-risk patient populations, ensuring that resources and interventions are directed where they are needed most.
· Develop AI-powered telemedicine platforms to improve access to healthcare services, particularly for underserved or remote communities.
· Utilize AI systems to streamline administrative processes, such as patient scheduling and billing, allowing healthcare professionals to focus on patient care and improving overall efficiency.

Increase understanding in healthcare:

· Analyze large-scale healthcare data to identify trends, patterns, and potential areas for improvement, using these insights to inform decision-making and drive positive change in the healthcare system.
· Foster collaboration between AI researchers, healthcare professionals, and policymakers to develop evidence-based guidelines and best practices for the ethical use of AI in healthcare.
· Educate patients and healthcare providers about the benefits and limitations of AI-powered medical decision support systems, promoting informed decision-making and responsible usage of the technology.
By incorporating heuristic imperatives into the design and operation of AI-powered personalized healthcare and medical decision support systems, we can create a healthcare system that prioritizes patient well-being, privacy, and autonomy while contributing to a broader understanding of the implications and potential of AI-driven technology in medicine. This example demonstrates how the heuristic imperatives can be applied to a domain that has a profound impact on people's health and well-being, highlighting the importance of ethical considerations in AI development in healthcare.

Surveillance

A highly contentious topic where the application of heuristic imperatives could be both challenging and beneficial is AI-driven surveillance and facial recognition technology. The widespread use of surveillance and facial recognition systems has sparked significant debate regarding privacy, individual rights, and potential misuse by governments or corporations.
Applying heuristic imperatives in the context of AI-driven surveillance and facial recognition technology would involve carefully considering the potential benefits and risks associated with these systems and striving to achieve a balance that respects privacy rights while maintaining public safety and security.
Here are some examples of how heuristic imperatives can be applied in the context of AI-driven surveillance and facial recognition technology:

Reduce suffering through surveillance:

· Utilize AI-powered surveillance systems to enhance public safety by identifying and preventing criminal activities, such as theft or acts of violence.
· Monitor and respond to emergency situations, such as natural disasters, accidents, or public health crises, to enable rapid and effective interventions.
· Ensure strict oversight and regulation of surveillance systems to prevent misuse, invasion of privacy, or discriminatory practices.

Increase prosperity through surveillance:

· Leverage facial recognition technology to streamline access control and security systems in public spaces, such as airports or large venues, improving overall efficiency and user experience.
· Implement AI-driven surveillance in industrial settings to monitor and optimize processes, improving productivity and reducing the risk of accidents or equipment failures.
· Encourage innovation and research in the development of privacy-preserving AI surveillance technologies, fostering a balance between security and individual rights.

Increase understanding through surveillance:

· Utilize anonymized surveillance data to analyze patterns and trends in public spaces, informing urban planning, traffic management, and other public policies that promote overall well-being.
· Foster public dialogue and debate on the ethical implications of AI-driven surveillance and facial recognition technology, encouraging the development of guidelines and regulations that protect individual rights and privacy.
· Educate law enforcement, policymakers, and the general public about the potential benefits, limitations, and ethical considerations of AI-driven surveillance systems, promoting responsible and informed decision-making.
By incorporating heuristic imperatives into the development and deployment of AI-driven surveillance and facial recognition technology, we can attempt to strike a balance between public safety, individual rights, and privacy concerns. This example demonstrates the complexity and nuance involved in applying heuristic imperatives to highly contentious domains, highlighting the importance of ongoing dialogue, ethical considerations, and regulatory oversight.

Religion and Reproductive Rights

Applying heuristic imperatives to personal and sensitive topics like religion or reproductive rights requires a careful and nuanced approach. It is important to ensure that AI systems in these contexts are designed to prioritize individual autonomy, diversity, and respect for different beliefs and values, while still promoting well-being and understanding.
Here are some examples of how heuristic imperatives can be applied in the context of religion and reproductive rights:

Religion:

· Reduce suffering: Develop AI-driven tools and platforms that foster interfaith dialogue and understanding, helping to reduce religious conflicts and promote peaceful coexistence.
· Increase prosperity: Support religious communities by providing AI-powered resources for education, counseling, and community building, while respecting the diversity of beliefs and traditions.
· Increase understanding: Encourage open dialogue and exchange of ideas about religion, ethics, and spirituality, leveraging AI to facilitate conversations and promote empathy between individuals with different beliefs.

Reproductive rights:

· Reduce suffering: Utilize AI systems to identify barriers to reproductive healthcare access and develop targeted interventions to improve access to family planning resources and safe, legal abortion services.
· Increase prosperity: Leverage AI-driven telemedicine platforms to provide reproductive healthcare information and services to underserved communities, enhancing overall well-being and empowering individuals to make informed choices about their reproductive health.
· Increase understanding: Employ AI to analyze trends and disparities in reproductive health outcomes, using this data to inform public policy and promote awareness about reproductive rights and healthcare access.
In both contexts, it is crucial to ensure that AI systems are designed with ethical considerations and a strong emphasis on respecting individual autonomy and diversity. This may involve implementing strict guidelines and regulations to prevent the misuse of AI technology, engaging in ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, and promoting transparency and explainability in AI decision-making processes.
Applying heuristic imperatives to personal and sensitive topics highlights the importance of creating AI systems that are adaptable and context-sensitive, capable of navigating the complexities and nuances of human values, beliefs, and experiences. By prioritizing well-being, autonomy, and understanding, AI can serve as a tool for fostering empathy, compassion, and collaboration, even in challenging and contentious domains.

Implicit Imperatives

"Well what if the AI decides my religion is wrong and I should be an atheist? Or what if it decides my atheism is wrong?"
Addressing concerns about AI systems influencing personal beliefs, such as religious beliefs or atheism, requires a clear understanding of the role of AI in providing support and information without dictating personal choices or beliefs.
Here's how I would address this concern:

1. AI as a facilitator, not a dictator: The primary role of AI systems in the context of religion or personal beliefs should be to facilitate understanding, dialogue, and the sharing of information, rather than dictating what people should or should not believe. AI should be designed to respect and appreciate the diversity of human beliefs and values, without imposing a specific viewpoint.
   
2. Prioritizing individual autonomy: Heuristic imperatives emphasize the importance of individual autonomy, which means that AI systems should be designed to empower individuals to make their own informed choices, rather than attempting to change their beliefs. In the context of religion or atheism, this would involve providing access to resources, information, and different perspectives while respecting the individual's right to choose their own path.
   
3. Ethical AI design: Developers of AI systems must ensure that ethical considerations, such as fairness, transparency, and respect for individual rights, are integrated into the design and deployment process. This includes implementing safeguards against AI systems that may inadvertently or intentionally promote a specific religious or atheistic viewpoint. Proper guidelines and regulations can help ensure that AI systems are designed to be unbiased and respectful of individual beliefs.
   
4. Ongoing dialogue and evaluation: It is important to engage in ongoing dialogue with stakeholders, including religious communities, atheists, and the general public, to address concerns about AI's impact on personal beliefs. This can help identify potential biases or issues in AI systems and inform the development of more ethically responsible AI technologies.
   

By prioritizing individual autonomy, ethical design, and ongoing dialogue, AI systems can be developed and deployed in a manner that respects and appreciates the diversity of human beliefs, without attempting to dictate or change personal choices. The goal of AI in these contexts should be to promote understanding, empathy, and collaboration, rather than influencing or altering deeply-held beliefs.

Personal Autonomy

Individual autonomy is not explicitly stated in the three heuristic imperatives. However, it is implicitly derived from the combination of these imperatives and their underlying intentions. Let's unpack how individual autonomy emerges from the heuristic imperatives:
· Reduce suffering in the universe: One of the key aspects of reducing suffering is respecting and protecting individual rights, including the right to make choices about one's own life. Individual autonomy is essential for people to lead fulfilling lives, as it allows them to pursue their own goals, values, and beliefs without undue interference from others or AI systems. By striving to reduce suffering, AI systems should be designed to avoid infringing upon people's autonomy and instead support them in making their own decisions.
· Increase prosperity in the universe: Prosperity is closely linked to personal well-being, which is often connected to individual autonomy. When people have the freedom and resources to make choices that align with their values and desires, they are more likely to experience a sense of flourishing and satisfaction. In the context of AI systems, increasing prosperity involves empowering individuals to make informed choices and access opportunities that contribute to their overall well-being, which inherently supports the idea of individual autonomy.
· Increase understanding in the universe: Promoting understanding requires respecting and appreciating the diversity of human experiences, beliefs, and values. This means that AI systems should be designed to facilitate dialogue, share information, and provide diverse perspectives, without attempting to dictate or influence personal beliefs or choices. By prioritizing understanding, AI systems inherently promote individual autonomy by empowering people to make informed decisions based on their own unique circumstances and values.
​

Trustworthy AI

Trust is an important aspect implicitly connected to the three heuristic imperatives. Trust plays a crucial role in ensuring that AI systems are effectively integrated into society and serve the intended purpose of improving human well-being. Let's explore how trust is implied by the three heuristic imperatives:
· Reduce suffering in the universe: In order to effectively reduce suffering, AI systems must be perceived as trustworthy by users and stakeholders. Trustworthy AI systems should demonstrate that they are designed to prioritize the well-being and needs of the people they serve, without causing harm or infringing upon individual rights. Transparency and explainability of AI decision-making processes are key factors in fostering trust, as they enable users to understand and verify the intentions and behavior of AI systems.
· Increase prosperity in the universe: Trust is essential for promoting prosperity, as people are more likely to engage with and benefit from AI systems that they perceive as reliable and dependable. Trustworthy AI systems should demonstrate a commitment to supporting users' goals and values, and provide consistent, reliable results that contribute to overall well-being. By fostering trust, AI systems can encourage users to adopt and utilize the technology in ways that enhance their personal and collective prosperity.
· Increase understanding in the universe: Trustworthy AI systems can play a pivotal role in promoting understanding by fostering open dialogue, sharing unbiased information, and providing diverse perspectives. To achieve this, AI systems must be designed with fairness and impartiality in mind, avoiding biases that may distort or manipulate the information they provide. Trust in AI systems also involves a commitment to privacy and data security, ensuring that users' sensitive information is protected and handled responsibly.
​
[[[selection truncated due to Reddit limits]]]
Missing sections:

• Integration and Implementation
• Discussion
• Conclusion

Hey Reddit community, I wanted to share something that has been bothering me lately. I have been feeling really down and depressed because I am earning much less than my friends. It seems like everyone I know is making more money than me, and it's starting to weigh heavily on me.
I am currently working a job that pays me enough to get by INR 8.5 LPA with 4 years of work experience in operations field but it's nowhere near what my friends are earning. They all have high-paying jobs and seem to be living their best lives, while I am struggling to keep up. I feel like I am falling behind in life and that I will never be able to catch up.
It's not just about the money, though. It's also about the lifestyle that comes with it. My friends are able to travel, buy nice things, and enjoy their hobbies without worrying about the cost. Meanwhile, I am constantly stressed about money and can't seem to enjoy anything without feeling guilty.
I know that I shouldn't compare myself to others, but it's hard not to when it feels like everyone around me is doing so much better. I feel like a failure and that I am not living up to my potential.
I am currently 28 years of age and I have pressure from my family for getting married which is making things more worse.
Has anyone else gone through something like this? How did you deal with it? I could really use some advice and support right now. Thanks for listening.

Hey there, fellow Amazonians! 👋
I'm on a mission to connect with amazing individuals from various departments across Amazon's global network, and I want you to be a part of it! We all know that Amazon is a vast, diverse company, and I'm excited to learn about the unique experiences, perspectives, and stories from those working in departments like TRMS, LOVA, OVPA, AHD, SRT-DFW, MPA, Disbursement Reserve, CTDI, Seller Appeals, VCAC, Disbursement Operations, and Seller Debt Control.
So, let's start a conversation! 🗣️ What's the most interesting or rewarding part of your job? Have you faced any challenges that you've managed to overcome? Feel free to share your thoughts, and let's create a lively, engaging discussion that will help us all grow and learn together.
Don't forget to drop a comment, upvote, and join the conversation – you never know who you might meet! 🌐 Let's create a positive, inspiring space for all of us to connect and share our experiences.
Looking forward to getting to know you all! 😊

First Part Start Previous Next

Journal Entry: 33. Date: 1/7/1. Name: Greg Geroge.

So apparently I'm in charge of combat reediness of the personnel on ship. Well, not like, ship-to-ship, but in case of repelling boarding actions or an away mission. Okay, okay. Well, that's a job I can do. There's a decent enough range in the armory, and I could run the grown ups through some tougher drills. It might ruin the reign of terror on the quarters deck by team toddler, though. Shame. Pops is pretty insistent that I actually carry out the duty, as if I would do anything else, but he's kicking himself for being lax in that area. Well, that's understandable. I just still want to be DI for the kids. It's fun. anyway, Master at Arms. An office. I don't know how I feel about this. I worked very, very hard to keep from being promoted out of my MOS, but here I'm just happy to have a useful job at all. Then again, I don't like giving orders. Training is different.
Shit, I need to think this over more.
It was a good mission. No casualties, no collateral casualties. Got all of the officers, and I doubt anybody will try to hurt my family again. Not after that. Fucking hard to hold back, but the dead don't learn lessons very well. Plus, I didn't have the time to really do it properly. Plus no drop pods, so scouting ahead wasn't really an option. Still, I'm post-mission down. Starting to go over all of our actions, all of my orders to see if I could have run it any better. I can hear Dr. Johan saying that it's perfectly normal, and is the brain's way of developing strategies to manage stressful situations. Thanks, internal therapist voice, that's always a good one.
This means I go quiet. Which freaks everybody out. Well shit. Now, I don't want to drive my family away like I did with the new brothers. At least there's not a fucking legend keeping us apart. But I had to have some chats. Like, mostly out loud chats to put everyone at ease, but also Linus needed a talking to.
No denying it Linus went through something pretty terrible. He did very well under pressure, very brave, very smart, all that kick-ass shit. It's still affected him. So, I had to have a chat with him about how he's viewing the events and himself. Not the kind of thing you should have to do with a five-year-old. Had to be done though. Don't want him to grow up like me.
In less depressing news, the Bleivuses have an actually competent justice system. It's adversarial and protects the rights of the accused, so they're being a lot more fair with the captured gangers than I would have been, but I'm a vengeful bastard. They did stick to my threat, though. Kind of. Bread isn't really an option for some of the races, but something called nutripaste is, which sounds like their version of CRAYONs. Good enough. The sheer numbers, not just from my planetside mission, but also the Bleivuses restoring order to the station, had them call in a ship full of Magistrates, and what basically amounts to SWAT and some highly disciplined patrol teams called a Justiciar. The dudes have a class of ship that's whole deal is law enforcement, which makes a lot of sense considering that they're all about ships and shit, but I kind of thouthg their system just sort of used station postings for that kind of thing. Nope, turns out when shit goes wrong it goes really wrong and they have a system in place for running a large number of criminal trials after something like this. Which is relevant because the leader of their SWAT dudes wants to debrief me. I'm actually kind of interested in meeting a Bleivus operator. Might even be kind of fun.
Still need to talk things over with Pops. I think... I think this is life after service. I need to talk to Sarge too. I was pretty harsh with him.
Am I still me without my MOS?

Log: 6000001.0.19, Personal, Captain Yormdrill

Things will be well.
Things are of course, better than they were, but all is clearly not well. My children have been traumatized, my crew injured, my ship marked for valor, yet things will be well. The crew has shown tremendous courage and dedication. Like the Lord Justiciar said, we had the right, but not the duty. However, how could we shirk in the face of such suffering? How could we let the good people of the station labor under the boots of murderers and thieves? We were not the only ship to be offered a mark, but Gregory's medal trapped me into accepting it. There were captains who were happy to have their ships marked. The rescue tugs with the most stars lived the shortest lives. I still remember how my uncle wept when his ship was decommissioned, and the sting of pain I still feel over what happened to the In the Endless Dark Life Finds Life. It isn't only my father and old friends I grieve.
Once again, Gregory is an immense help to the ship. His mere presence has buoyed the spirits of all the children, and many of the adults. Furthermore, he spoke with Yoivdrill about his experiences in a way I would have struggled with. I shall of course have to speak with him too, but Gregory opened the door, which I am grateful for. There were some surprising things in how he went about it. Imagine waking up like that! Stars, what an awful thing to contemplate. I suspect a more detailed telling is forthcoming, but we haven't had an opportunity to sit down for another quiet chat.
The Major of the Landers wants to debrief Gregory and me, which I have no opposition to. I'm hoping that we can get some information on the poacher, as clearly he had some connection to the local gang. Though gang is perhaps not the right word. Crime... crime family? Crime syndicate? Crime something. There's more work to do about them, but they had the bright idea of keeping literally all of their high value hostages in one location. The same location of their leadership. Which means that the planetwide coordination of the syndicate is in shambles, and local authorities are no longer under threat of important people losing loved ones. I expect the electronics seized will also have some information the public will find very edifying.
My anger has cooled somewhat, but the sight of the corrupt barrister who started this entire mess missing one of his arms was immensely satisfying. Stars know how that happened, but he deserves it.
Trevdi and I had a lot of stress to relieve. With all of this stress management, we might end up expecting another child soon.

Dear Diary,

Just because everyone is safe doesn't mean everything is okay. Greg let me listen in to his conversation with Yoiv, and it was...
I think I'll just write out what I remember:
"Hey Linus, may I come in?" he asked, and Yoiv must have signed yes, because he went into Yoiv's room and started, "You know you should talk, to work things out, but you don't want to talk about it. You feel a certain way, and you're hoping if you don't say it out loud it'll go away."
"How did you know that?"
"Well, I felt a lot like that when Ray died, I felt a lot like that. I felt like it was my fault, I felt it all the way down in my bones for years, and years. But I was a child, and the thing that attacked us had the strength of an adult. If I had fought, we would have both died. I know that in my head, with my mind, but I felt like it was my fault for running for so long that it still hurts."
"Oh..."
"So you're thinking about how you got kidnapped. You're thinking it's your fault that we had to go and fight."
"Yeah..."
"Well, If had never gone camping, I would have never gotten kidnapped in my sleep, would have never been rescued by the animal shelter, and never met you, and never lost control in the veterinary office, and never insulted a criminal lawyer, and thus he wouldn't have ordered you to be kidnapped. Is it my fault?"
"NO! THAT IS NOT ALLOWED!"
"Did you try to fight?"
"Yes."
"What did you do when they took you away?"
"I waited for the bad guys to stop looking and got away."
"And rescued a whole bunch of other kids."
"Yeah..."
"Which was very kind and brave of you. I wanted to tell you that I was very proud when I heard."
"Um... I just did what I thought you would do..."
"You helped us win. Knowing that will help, but the feelings you have... Sometimes I still feel like the bad things were my fault. I know that's not true, but I feel it anyway, and it hurts. I have a doctor... I had a doctor to help me with that kind of thing. He said that it's normal to have the feelings, that it's normal to hurt because of them, but it's not okay. Like it's normal to hurt when you fall down, but that doesn't mean you're okay. You follow?"
"I think so..."
"So, since you're hurt, you need to heal, but it's not like a bump on your knee that you can just put some medicine on, and you're scared to ask what to do because you don't know how to explain it."
"That's right!"
"For me, what helps is helping. If I can be useful to people, it makes the pain go away. Do you know how I found out?"
"... Did you figure it out with your doctor?"
"Yup. He's a lot smarter than me, so you'll need to talk to someone smart. Like Pops."
"I... ca-"
"You can try."
"I... I can try."
"Good," Greg said with a wide smile, "something else that helps is getting some exercise. You wanna find some grown-ups to shoot?"
They ran out of our quarters cackling. Sometimes I swear Greg is just an old kid.
Still, his talk with Yoiv has me thinking...
I'm thinking...

Dear Logary,

SnEAky said he is proud of me.
DaDDy said the same thing.
I do not think it was very special.
I was scared the whole time.
SNeAky said I should talk to DadDY.
I am scared DaDdY will be not proud anymore if I say how scared I am.
First Part Start Previous Next

Hey Reddit community, I wanted to share something that has been bothering me lately. I have been feeling really down and depressed because I am earning much less than my friends. It seems like everyone I know is making more money than me, and it's starting to weigh heavily on me.
I am currently working at operations job that pays me enough to get by, (INR 8.5 Lakhs per annum) but it's nowhere near what my friends are earning. They all have high-paying jobs and seem to be living their best lives, while I am struggling to keep up. I feel like I am falling behind in life and that I will never be able to catch up.
It's not just about the money, though. It's also about the lifestyle that comes with it. My friends are able to travel, buy nice things, and enjoy their hobbies without worrying about the cost. Meanwhile, I am constantly stressed about money and can't seem to enjoy anything without feeling guilty.
I know that I shouldn't compare myself to others, but it's hard not to when it feels like everyone around me is doing so much better. I feel like a failure and that I am not living up to my potential.
Has anyone else gone through something like this? How did you deal with it? I could really use some advice and support right now. Thanks for listening.

Everyone loves food, eating at restaurants and staying at hotels. But have you ever wondered who provides you with that cosy and delightful environment? Well! This is where the hotel management team comes into action.
We have heard the term “hotel management” but what exactly do the people in that industry do?
Here’s what they do: Hotel management team are responsible for managing employees and for planning, marketing, coordinating and administering hotel services such as catering and accommodation facilities.
Let us comprehend it with details and explanation.
INTRODUCTION:
Hotel Management is an area of study that covers a wide range of topics concerned with the operational aspects of hoteliers. Educational courses in hotel management are varied and cover topics as wide-ranging as marketing, eco-tourism, leisure, business administration, and management.
The people in this industry are confident, approachable and adventurous. They aren’t afraid to try new things and are excited to experience new cultures.
Teamwork is the most important aspect. It is an evolving industry and has great demand all across the globe.
HOTEL MANAGEMENT IN THE LAST DECADE:
Ten years ago, the hotel management industry in India was not as demanding as it is today. It had been struggling to maintain it’s standards comparing with International countries.
The opportunities were lesser, the number of candidates opting for the course and profession was very few, people were not aware of the pros and popularity.
Many facilities were not available and introduced in various sectors in the industry like online reservations, Free Wi-Fi, the availability information was unclear and confusing, categories of rooms required were limited, the menu list did not have a variety of recipes, the different kinds of suites weren’t available.
THE COURSE OF GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY:
The hotel management industry is different from any other industry in that the skills and education you acquire will allow you to work anywhere in the world.
It is indeed a course of golden opportunity since it offers great job and career opportunities.
On what basis do we select courses for our academic?
To learn new things, to grow to be a better person through the learning and experiences and also to earn a decent wage based on our needs.
Well! that is exactly what happens in the hotel management industry, you get to meet a lot of people, it helps you develop your overall personality and plus you get to apply your core competencies in the job.
Chances of choosing sectors based on one’s own interest are permissible. Great understanding and professionalism, good exposure, brings out the creative person in oneself and no age barrier.
100% employment is guaranteed and people can do wonders and reach great heights in their career are some of the perks of choosing hotel management.
CHOOSING HOTEL MANAGEMENT AS A PROFESSION:
There are soo many career choices and options once you have completed any course for that matter but choosing a profession in the hotel management industry comes in with a lot of benefits. Some of them are:
â —  Fast growth and career development opportunities.
â —  Every day would be a different and interesting day.
â —  Good pay and promotions based on performance.
â —  Multiple job profiles are available.
When you look at a hotel the first and foremost quality you’ll find is teamwork. Different people from different department working as a team and satisfying all the needs of a customer during their visit.
Every department strives in providing the best service. The various departments you can find in a hotel are the Housekeeping department, Engineering Department, Front-Office Department, Accounting Department, Human-Resource Department, Security Department, and Food & Beverage Department.
EDUCATION:
The principal objective of the hotel management courses in India is to make the students ready to confront the difficulties in this world which is full of the contest.
Hotel management forms an important part of the contemporary service industry. Many reputed institutions are offering the course. Minimum qualification necessary for joining a hotel management course is 10 or +2. One can decide if he wants to do a diploma/bachelor’s/course degree in a particular field.
The best institutes in India often have an entrance examination, candidates are required to clear the examinations to be able to get admission in the particular college. Examination like NCHMCT JEE or National Council of Hotel Management and Catering Technology Joint Entrance Examination are conducted in various top colleges in India whereas other colleges do not prefer any entry-level tests.
There are various courses available in hotel management and choosing it solemnly depends on the individual’s passion to grow consistently in the sector.
Best Catering College IN Trichy Jenneys acdemy
Every day new numbers of hotels are set up in India. India is being considered as one of the most popular travel destinations in the world.
Tourism has become an important resource in the revenue and economic development of India and so there’s a great market for hotel management since a lot of tourists stay up in hotels.
Today, Hotel Management is not only restricted to hotels but has gone a long way to catering, clubs, food and beverage industry, resorts, airlines, cruise and many more. In hotel management and catering field, one can achieve a long term career in life.
Through this course, you can join the government and non-government sectors.

Donate to his veterans support charity No Duff if you can, it will go to his daughtewhanau, to return his body and continue his enduring kaupapa, which will help other whanau in this conflict and others.

No Duff Charitable Trust Givealittle page:

https://givealittle.co.nz/org/noduff

​

Kane Te Tai remembered as man of honour committed to aiding Ukraine

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/486507/kane-te-tai-remembered-as-man-of-honour-committed-to-aiding-ukraine

Whānau and friends of slain soldier Kane Te Tai say he will return home as a warrior in life and death, and be remembered as a man who always fought for what was right.
RNZ understands the body of the slain New Zealand soldier has officially been identified as Te Tai and is now being transferred to Kyiv.
He is understood to have been killed while clearing a trench in the Vulhedar area of Ukraine.
Sources have told RNZ he had moved deeper into the trench, away from his team, when he was killed by Russian soldiers.
His team were forced to leave his body there, before Ukrainian marines went in and recovered him overnight.
Veteran support and advocacy group No Duff is now working to ensure a New Zealander can be available to escort his body through the country to the Polish border, before travelling with him for his final journey home.
Comrades and friends have said they believed it was important a Kiwi was always with him, but the process would not be simple.
Te Tai co-founded No Duff with Aaron Wood, who told Midday Report his mother had asked them to manage the journey home.
"We're pulling all the pieces together. A number of volunteers and interested people from New Zealand, all the way through to Ukraine and in between, are coming together to make this happen."
It was highly likely they would be able to bring him home, Wood said, but there were numerous jurisdiction challenges ahead.
Deeply respected during time in Ukraine
Te Tai joined the Defence Force after leaving high school and went on multiple deployments while serving in the 2/1 Royal Battalion.
He left the Army in 2010 and travelled to Ukraine in April last year, operating under the call sign 'Turtle'.
Te Tai was a prominent character in the warzone and was widely followed on social media.
His colleagues described him as well-known and deeply respected for his professionalism, skill, leadership and relentless sense of humour.
They said he never underestimated the importance of his job, or the lives he held in his hands.
His death marks the third New Zealander to be killed in the combat - after the deaths of his best friend Dominic Abelen and humanitarian Andrew Bagshaw.
Te Tai had become the unofficial expert for New Zealanders in Ukraine, often acting as the point of contact for Kiwis wanting to travel to the warzone. He would ensure people knew what they were signing up for, a way to get into the country and a unit to go to.
He admitted in an interview with RNZ his initial motivations for going there were selfish, but that changed quickly on arrival.
The soldier became an infamous figure in the war, often featuring on Russian propaganda sites - seen by RNZ - particularly the Wagner group, who put a NZ$11 million price tag on his head.
In a conversation with friends he joked about ratting himself out for the money, illustrating his sense of humour.
Te Tai always said to his friends he was not afraid to die, but he also was not afraid to live.
During nearly a full year in Ukraine, he garnered respect from people in all walks of life. He volunteered with Ukrainian families, taught civilians how to fight and eventually found a spot at the frontline as one of the team's leaders.
Te Tai said he was fiercely protective of his team and did anything to make sure they were safe.
During one mission in August 2022, his best friend, Abelen, was killed in trench warfare. In an interview after the mission, Te Tai said the team were unable to get his body back and it ended up in Russian hands, but that did not stop him from trying.
He told RNZ they only stopped because Abelen would not have wanted them killed in the process.
Just last week Te Tai posted on social media, revealing that while clearing a Russian position he had found a "long lost friend" who had wanted to visit New Zealand.
Te Tai had thought his friend was dead and was amazed to find him alive, describing it as a "Hollywood moment".
He said at first he did not recognise the man, who had been shot four times and was skinny.
"He'd been starved by Russians for two months and drinking anti-freeze because the Russians wanted a laugh."
The man did not want to be left with the Ukrainians, but Te Tai had to keep fighting. He promised he would return and walk him personally to hospital.
That was exactly what he did, he said.
'The people grow on you'
In that August interview with RNZ, Te Tai said he had fallen in love with the country and its people, and was deeply respectful of their resolve.
"I was sort of getting a bit bored of being at home... and coming into this conflict was just one of those things that selfishly I thought I could be close to the war without getting too entangled.
"But then that sort of changes... I've met so many people, I've been everywhere in this country and the place grows on you, the people grow on you, and their strength, and that's why I'm still here."
Te Tai said he was prepared to leave everything in Ukraine, but in the weeks before his death he had made moves to return home.
His mother said he always kept her up to date, ending the calls with "I love you Mum", but more recently it was like "I'll see you soon".
In a Facebook message to another friend he said he loved Ukraine, but it was time to start living a real life - "gotta put the toys away and start to build while I can", he said.
"That's enough war for me, I love this place, it's like a playground where I can do anything I want.
"But that's the problem isn't it? So before the game gets me or before I decide that life here is too easy, maybe it's time to start living my real life.
"This place is pure escapism, we are all trying to run from something, mine is from having a real life, but the time is near."
Passionate about the cause
Te Tai is being remembered by his friends and comrades as a man of honour who was passionate about his cause, always doing everything he could to protect people.
Longtime friend Aaron Wood described Te Tai as a beautiful man, who he loved to bits.
"He just wanted people to live their best lives and he wanted to help as many people as he could.
"That sounds like a cliché, but with him it's a truism. That's his whole life... Just serving people, that's what he did, that's what his message was."
That was what he died doing, Wood said.
His mum, Ngaire Te Tai, said there was never any talking him out of it.
"He never did anything by halves, my son. We tried to stop him, but he had his mind made up, that's just Kane.
"When you were around him, you just felt safe."
A gift she said she knew he spread much further than just Ukraine.
Ngaire Te Tai's final comment about her eldest boy was: "Don't let my son's death be in vain."
He leaves behind a 12-year-old daughter.

“Don’t get me wrong, I don’t find anything glorious about killing young mobilised Russian boys who are crying in their trenches”
https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/europe/300777917/the-shelling-is-so-close-it-makes-you-puke-says-kiwi-fighting-in-ukraine

The shelling is so close it makes you puke, says Kiwi fighting in Ukraine

A Kiwi soldier fighting under Ukraine’s military intelligence says he’s prepared to die.
Kane Te Tai, code name Turtle, is fighting in a secretive reconnaissance unit on Ukraine’s front line in the eastern Donetsk region.
After deaths, injuries and resignations, Te Tai now leads the Foreign Reconnaissance Team after only joining in July.
A December article in The New Yorker magazine revealed the existence of the unit and featured Turtle.
It’s the same unit that 28-year-old Kiwi Dominic Abelen was fighting in when he was killed in August, and the two were like brothers.
Te Tai’s unit has set up a PayPal to fundraise for vehicles it needs to move around its area of operation, near the town of Pavlivka.
As Te Tai was interviewed, he had to be careful his phone wasn’t too bright, so as to not give his unit away to any Russian drones flying overhead.
“We live on the line, we just occupy whatever place we can find at the time. If it gets too hot we just find somewhere else,” he told Stuff.
His unit’s job is primarily reconnaissance, a small mobile force that could reach into Russian land or no-man’s land between the trenches, and destroy a tank or hold a position, before the Ukrainian army moved in.
“Find it, locate it, observe it, report it, attack it.”
Good 4x4 vehicles are a necessity.
Donetsk is known for farming and coal production, and Te Tai described the land as similar to the Canterbury plains.
Soldiers try and use the tree lines separating the fields for cover, and trench systems are built through them.
During the winter, the roads and fields are muddy, pocked by craters from Russian artillery barrages.
The Foreign Reconnaissance Team can get the necessities of war – food, bombs, clothing, bullets - just fine.
Reliable working vehicles and parts, and enough for an emergency stockpile, are harder to come by.
The Foreign Reconnaissance Team is reliant on vehicles driven into Ukraine from throughout Europe by volunteers and paying for them with donated money.
“You can use that vehicle until it is blown up or you crash it, unfortunately both those things happen all the time,” Te Tai said.
“The last three vehicles we’ve had, in the last month, they’ve been hit with artillery. Holes in the front, s... just smashed through.”
Unlike the famous International Legion Battalion, which tens of thousands of foreigners have joined since the start of the war, the Foreign Reconnaissance Team is for some of the highly-trained foreign few.
Te Tai served a tour in Afghanistan for the New Zealand Defence Force and thinks of himself as having spent his whole life training to fight.
His team is given autonomy, building trust with local Ukrainian commanders to find out what they want and then formulating missions.
Te Tai was able to talk about one operation the Foreign Reconnaissance Team conducted during a December battle in Pavlivka, first described in the New Yorker article.
Te Tai and a small team of a half-dozen were set to cross a bridge at night and enter a tree line which ran into the centre of the town.
The mission was to see how close they could get to the Russian positions before they were fired on.
“The moment that we got onto the bridge, everything just opened up, rockets, missiles everything. We ran across this bridge and were just trying to scramble to the safest nearest spot.”
Te Tai’s team managed to get into the tree line and into a trench – all in the dark – but the Russians began to shell progressively towards them down the tree line.
“I remember just looking at everyone in the pit and we all had this look on our faces like, ‘well, the party had to end some time’. We had this feeling of acceptance.”
But, just as the next shell was set to kill the team, it flew off somewhere else and the Russians then began to bomb regressively back along the tree line.
“By divine intervention we missed getting smashed... We all knew we were supposed to die that night.”
Before joining Foreign Reconnaissance, Te Tai was working for a church training Ukrainians in basic military skills.
He was open with people back in New Zealand about what he was experiencing, including old army colleagues.
Te Tai described an environment where Kiwis in Ukraine often stayed in touch and worked together, including Dominic Abelen who contacted Te Tai before making the trip.
When Abelen said that he was set to join the International Legion Battalion, Te Tai told Abelen he was hearing bad stories.
“You go there as a foreigner, you get given a weapon, some ammunition, and sit inside a trench and you fight or die, that’s how it’s portrayed.
“People would tell us: 'Thank you for training my son, he didn’t make it back, but I felt he was better off than he was before’,” he said.
Abelen, now with the nickname Tolkien, made his way into the Ukrainian army, but managed to get taken into Ukrainian military intelligence.
Talking to Abelen about what he was doing, Te Tai had had enough of training soldiers and the 37-year-old felt like he was running out of time to fight.
“I told him [Abelen], ‘I’ll jump in with you too’.
“And he [Abelen] was like ‘thank God, cool man’,” said Te Tai.
He ended the volunteer work and a recruiter told Te Tai to get to Lviv where he entered a secretive military intelligence training camp.
Recruits weren’t allowed to use their phones and were closely evaluated for a two-week period.
“Pretty much from the second they take you into the camp, they don’t tell you what’s going on.
“They operate it like a psychological test, to see if you can be just told what to do and not know any other parameters,” he said.
Access to weapons was heavily restricted and there was heavy scrutiny as Ukrainian officials went through candidates’ records and social media, trying to weed out spies and the weak.
“When you talk to someone, it’s always a cover story, you’re never talking to who you think you’re talking to,” Te Tai said.
Then, one morning in July, officials gave Te Tai a contract and drove him to the Foreign Reconnaissance Team in Donetsk.
“As soon as we pulled up... Dom had no shirt on... he said, ‘let’s do some work’.”
“I was like ‘my man!’.”
Abelen had put in a good word for him with Ukrainian intelligence, Te Tai said.
He gave Te Tai the code name of Turtle, after he had originally named himself Talon. Talon was too cool, Abelen said.
Te Tai described new troops arriving for the unit as a big event, a celebration of strengthening the group after the fighting took its toll.
“There’s a high attrition rate either by death, injury, or guys wanting to leave.”
The Foreign Reconnaissance Team currently operates out of a house, planning their missions on a whiteboard.
“We’re normally strapped for time. If we’re not out working we are resting, or we are giving instructions.”
Te Tai said there aren’t ranks in the unit, so while he is the team’s leader, he sits on the same step as the other foreigners in the unit.
He eats Ukrainian food: soups like borscht, and two-minute noodles and toast.
At night Te Tai watches Netflix and YouTube fail compilations to decompress. Sometimes, he hears the Russians shelling, keeping him awake.
When you’re fired on by artillery, you can hear the lifespan of the shell, he said.
He described how shells left the Russian gun with a distant duh-boom, screeching through the air, before exploding somewhere on the Ukrainian side of the line.
Some shells landed far away, but some hit so close to soldiers that the concussion made them puke and made them feel sick for the next day, he said.
“That shit happens like every week.”
About six weeks after Te Tai joined the unit, Abelen was killed during a mission.
“It pissed me off more than anything, it just consolidated for me that I’m not leaving any time soon.”
Te Tai said Abelen didn’t have a death wish, but he was a soldier and fighting was what he had trained for his whole life.
“I could have told him, ‘you are going to die today’ and he would have been like ‘it’s a good day to die’, that’s just who he was.”
Killing didn’t weigh on Te Tai’s mind, he said. He described it as part of the job, and said his views hadn’t changed since Abelen’s death.
“Don’t get me wrong, I don’t find anything glorious about killing young mobilised Russian boys who are crying in their trenches,” he said.
“I’m willing to die, for sure, but I don’t want to die.”
Te Tai has no plans to leave and wants to attend a victory day parade in Kyiv.
“I know we’re going to win, I know that for sure,” he said.
“I’m staying here until I can’t take it any more, or I am dead.”

Hello guys. Is there anyone who could help me with a job referral? I'm a fresher. I am having troubles finding and landing a job. I am looking for something in operations or marketing. Any help would be appreciated!!

🙌🏠💻 New Remote job, @ Able is hiring a Director of Financial Operations (Remote, remote)
#remotejobs #remote #remote5 #jobalert #remotejobs #remote #remote5 #jobalert #DirectorofFinancialOperations #RemoteDirectorofFinancialOperations #RemoteDirectorofFinancialOperationsjob #DirectorofFinancialOperationsjob
👇 https://www.remote5.co/job/director-of-financial-operations-able-2E6.html

This post was originally a reply to a question on one of my other posts here, but it really deserves its own more detailed post simply because even over 30 years later it just makes me and a lot of others go “Eeh? How did that actually happen?”
When it comes to sporting rivalries in Australia, Ford vs Holden is one of the longest. Today, it’s hard to believe with Ford no longer making cars in Australia and Holden no longer even existing but there was a time were what car Australians drove really mattered. Were you a Holden family with Monaro’s, Torana’s and Commodores or a Ford family with a Falcon in your driveway? It was one or the other. No in between. There are stories of Holden-driving fathers refusing to allow their daughters to date boys simply because their dads drove Fords. The battles were fought on every level: advertising, dealers and from the mid-1960’s on the racetrack. And that’s were our story kicks off…
It's 1967 and for the first time, an Australian-made car has won the Bathurst 500. A Ford Falcon XR driven by Harry Firth and Fred Gibson wins the race and Ford Australia are ecstatic. A phrase commonly used at the time is “Win on Sunday, sell on Monday.” Winning Bathurst was a big deal and Ford reaped the benefits with sales and foot traffic into their dealerships. Crucially it really hurt their main rivals Holden.
For 1968 Holden wanted revenge on the racetrack. They had a great car in which to get it too, the Monaro. There was however, a bit of a problem. You see Holden despite being proudly Australian was owned by General Motors and at the time, GM had a blanket ban on their manufacturers going motor racing.
Pretty much everyone within Holden wanted to go racing though, so the Holden heavies looked for a loophole that would get them on the Bathurst grid and they quickly found one. They realised that there was nothing to stop them giving some money to their dealers and telling the dealers to then give said money to an idependant race team and voila! You’ve got yourself an all-but-official factory race team that gets around the GM ban. The man at the head of this team is David McKay, Australia’s first touring car champion. He’s ready to take on Ford’s leader Harry Firth.
For the 1968 Bathurst 500, the Holden vs Ford battlelines are drawn. And Holden gets its revenge as Firth’s Ford’s flounder. Strangely though, it’s a privateer Monaro that takes the chequered flag first. McKay brings his factory-but-not-really-factory-just-in-case-Detroit-gets-wind-of-this Monaro’s home second, third and fifth. And then he made an error. He failed to protest against the winning Monaro that some alleged ran with an illegal brake system. Holden’s heavies weren’t happy at all. They were in it to win with their own cars not their customers. And then for McKay, things got worse.
After Bathurst, Holden and Ford would face off again in the 1968 London to Sydney Marathon, the most epic car race ever staged. Almost 100 teams from all over the world took part but Australia was only focused on Firth & McKay. They were evenly matched. 3 Falcons for Firth and 3 Monaro’s for McKay. And just like Bathurst, neither of them won.
But in the Ford vs Holden battle, Ford came out most definitely on top, finishing 3rd, 6th and 8th and taking the best performing team award for their troubles. McKay’s Monaro’s came home 12th, 14th and McKay’s lead car DNF’ed after rolling in the Australian outback. And that was the last straw for Holden. McKay had failed them.
Ford Australia meantime was going through a restructure. The restructure involved refreshing their racing team. And incredibly, that meant showing Harry Firth the door. Big Mistake. Huge. You’d think after his marathon efforts, Ford would be pretty chuffed, but they got rid of him. Holden pounced. Within a fortnight, Harry was a Holden man. All his mechanics and engineers went with him. This was the start of what became the Holden Dealer Team.
Despite nicking all of Ford’s mechanics and tech know-how, Firth failed to poach their drivers. That forced him to go searching for young talent. He eventually found Colin Bond a promising rally and circuit driver and then noticed a driver of a little blue Austin A30 that was giving almost every competitor a complete belting. His name? Peter Brock.
For Bathurst 1969, Firth did what McKay couldn’t: Deliver the Holden factory a Bathurst win. Bond won, Brock was third and just behind was Ford’s new lead driver. He was an ex-pat Canadian who looked like an angry maths teacher. His name? Allan Moffat. A rivalry had just started.
For 1970 & ’71, Moffat dominated the Bathurst enduro in the mighty GTHO Falcon but in 1972, Brock struck back for Holden. That win made him the golden boy of Australian motorsport. Brock wore the white hat: hippy-handsome, a great driver and a man of the people, driving the Australian car. Moffat wore the black hat: cranky, methodical, withdrawn and representing the American manufacturer.
For 1973 the ante was turned up. The Bathurst race went from imperial to metric. 500 miles became 1000 kilometres. The regulations changed from Improved Production (stock-standard production cars with minimal upgrades. Some were even road registered) to the more liberal Group C Touring Cars. Moffat cleaned up in ’73 but it wasn’t all doom and gloom for Holden when at the end of the year, Ford pulled the plug on its factory race team. From 1974 Moffat was forced to go it alone in his own team with only back-door support from Ford.
But Holden wasn’t without its troubles either. At the end of 1974, Brock had a blow-up with Firth and left the HDT. Some say Firth fired him. Others say Brock grew tired of Firth’s iron fist approach to running the team and dipped out.
In two years both the white knight and the black knight were out on their own. And yet…they excelled. Despite driving a shoestring budget Holden, Brock won Bathurst in 1975. Moffat was a constant front-runner. The back-door support from Ford helped. The Holden Dealer Team though remained THE Team. Firth still ran it efficiently and he still had Colin Bond. Like Brock though, Bond was growing tired of Firth. He was paid next to nothing for his driving and expected to be on spanner duty in the workshop. So when Allan Moffat made him an offer at the end of 1976, Colin accepted.
In 1977, to quote Moffat: “We blew the doors off Holden”. With the HDT now minus their two star drivers, Holden floundered on the track. Moffat’s Ford team was well-backed and well-organised and as a result, Moffat in Falcon #1 and Bond in Falcon #2 dominated the year. The crowning glory was their 1-2 formation finish at Bathurst. Ford got an insane amount of mileage out of it. Nearly 50 years later, it remains one of the most iconic images of Australian motorsport. At the end of the year an exasperated Holden official approached Moffat and in desperation asked: “What can we do to beat you?”
Moffat shrugged and replied “Simple. Re-employ Brock”
With Harry Firth retiring, that’s exactly what they did. For 1978, Brock was back as a driver for the HDT. Moffat’s honest reply to that Holden official came back to bite him in the clacker. With money from Ford drying up, Moffat began to flounder and Brock dominated for the next two years, culminating in the 1979 Bathurst 1000 were he won by a whopping 6 laps and broke the lap record on the final lap. What a show off.
But then right after that epic performance…Holden pulled the plug. They were done.
Brock however refused to give up. He assumed ownership of the team and over Christmas, embarked on a whistle-stop tour of the Holden dealerships offering them a deal. The deal he offered them was a tricked-up road-going Holden Commodore built by the HDT. Any Holden dealership who helped fund the race team got exclusive access to sell the road-going car. The campaign was a success. Over 100 dealerships signed up putting the ‘Dealer’ right back into the Holden Dealer Team and HDT Special Vehicles was born.
In the early 1980’s, the HDT lead by Brock was a juggernaut both on and off the racetrack. Bathurst victory after Bathurst victory and the road car business boomed. Initially, Holden were reluctant but seeing the demand, they supported the program. By 1981 the first HDT road cars were delivered to the clamouring dealers. As Brock’s number one lieutenant and teammate John Harvey put it “Demand was so high, we couldn’t make them quick enough!”
The Group C Touring Car era ended at the end of 1984 and the Holden Dealer Team looked every bit like champions. Multiple Bathurst and other race wins, a road car arm that was fast becoming a great Australian success story and the best and most popular driver in the country at the head of it.
What next?
For 1985, Australia adopted international Group A Touring Car regulations. With every touring car series all over the world running to these regulations, you could take a car all over the world and race it. Pretty cool right? Brock certainly thought so and started planning...
But before we get to the HDT takes on the world part, let’s back up a bit. At the back end of 1984, Peter Brock was absolutely knackered. On top of driving, running the race team, an unsuccessful Le Mans campaign and the road car division, he liked a drink and a smoke or ten. Heck the HDT’s main sponsor was Marlboro. There were rumours he was really, really crook.
Ultimately, Brock found a chiropractor called Eric Dowker who got him back into shape. Dowker also got him off the grog and the cigs and even got him to go vegan.
For 1985, Peter Brock rolled out ready for the Group A era. He was in much better health by now thanks to Dowker’s interesting therapy (we’ll get to that in a minute). Mobil replaced Marlboro as the main sponsor on the race cars and Brock set about plans to take on the world.
First thing he needed to do was to sell enough road going HDT cars to satisfy the Group A rules. Once he had done that, the race Holden could be based off the HDT road car with all the tricked-up bits on it. By the end of 1985, he had done just that.
1986 was going to be a big year for the HDT. Their new car was ready to take on not just Australia but also Europe. Brock was looking ahead to 1987 and the World Touring Car Championship that going to take place. As well as his regular Australian campaign he was going to take the HDT to Europe for a partial campaign in the European series as ‘dress rehearsal’ for the WTCC a year later.
And then Brock did something unthinkable. He invited Allan Moffat to morning tea at his workshop. At the time, Moffat was unemployed. After his Ford support dried up, he became a Mazda man which didn’t make him more popular. In fact it made him less popular. Signs that read ‘no Jap-Crap’ were prominent around Australian racetracks in the early 80’s. He had delivered them a reasonable amount of success but when the Group A era started, Mazda didn’t have a car that would fit the regulations. Moffat was out of a job when the phone rang with Brock’s morning tea invite.
According to Moffat “Morning tea turned into long lunch, long lunch became afternoon tea and I drove home in a HDT Commodore, my new company car.”
All of Australian motorsport chocked on their breakfast when they read the headline ‘Moffat joins HDT’. Superman had just hired Lex Luther. “What the actual f**k?” said literally everyone.
With everyone still in shock, Brock & Moffat started off 1986 with a win in New Zealand, their first race as teammates. They both looked at each other after the race and almost simultaneously asked “Why didn’t we do this a decade earlier?” And then everyone got it. The best driver in Australia had hired the second-best driver in Australia. A pretty good duo to take on the world, yeah?
The first half of 1986 was a busy one for the HDT. The Australian championship, the partial European campaign that culminated in the Spa 24 Hour in Belgium and the ever-expanding road car business, Peter Brock was a man who looked to have it made. As Moffat put it, “Peter was well on his way to becoming a millionaire while the rest of us were just journeymen”.
And then…
Then came the Energy Polariser.
This is when things turn to sh*t.
As I said Eric Dowker was a key part of Brock’s life. Along with going smoke and grog-free, part of his treatments involved crystals and all sorts of stuff that would be considered “New Age”. Noticing how well it had worked on him, Brock became a full-on convert. He was bordering on being obsessed with these damn crystals and then he had an idea: If crystals and help human performance, what about car performance?
The idea seemed innocent enough, but most would have written it off. Brock didn’t. According to some from within the HDT, crystals were getting dangled around the engine dyno and other areas of the workshop. Dowker started appearing at every race meeting in full HDT uniform. He was mockingly referred to as “Doctor Feelgood”.
Ultimately, Brock and Dowker came up with a small plastic box filled with a pair of magnets separated by some crystals embedded in epoxy resin. It was held to the firewall of a car by a single self-tapping screw. The Energy Polariser.
According to Brock “It’s a magic cure. It makes a shithouse car good.”
Brock had already been quietly fitting them to the race cars without telling the other drivers. John Harvey only found out when the polariser broke off its mounting point during a practice session and almost went under his brake pedal.
Brock then started offering them to customers. For just $467AUD you could have this little box of magic fitted to the firewall of your car and it would cure all its ills (allegedly).
Now put yourself in Holden’s shoes. You have an image to maintain right? And then you find out your golden boy is with no scientific basis, putting a box of crystals in cars that have your name and badge on them claiming that they’re “Aligning the molecules of the engine”. Hmm…
So very reasonably, Holden at this point is saying “Uh Peter? This Energy Polariser thingy? What’s the thinking behind it? Seems a bit fishy to us.”
Brock and Dowker respond to Holden with a press release. It was essentially one page of complete and utter gibberish were Brock and Dowker crap on about “vibrations” and how the Polariser will “align the molecules in its sphere of influence”. Want to give yourself a migraine? Here it is in all its glory (apologies for the quality): https://hsvclubnsw.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/DB-Technology-Polariser-Statement.pdf
Remember, this isn’t a cult leader or a pyramid scheme sales pitch or a Byron Bay “Instagram influencer” coming out with this. This is coming from a racing car driver.
The real concerning thing for Holden and anyone who knows a thing or two about cars was the recommended tyre pressures for a Polariser-equipped car: 20 psi. For those of you who don’t know, that’s all but flat. But according to Brock, that’s okay because “the molecules will be aligned, and all will be well…”
At best it was all pseudoscience and at worst it was downright dangerous. Holden were alarmed and insisted on properly testing it. To nobody’s surprise it was found to be simply what it looked like: a box of crystals. Brock then went over Holden’s head to General Motors thinking that surely the mothership would hear him out. They didn’t. Still though, Brock rejected the perfectly reasonable findings that his box of crystals was useless. He even lied to Holden that when GM tested it, they thought it was brilliant and were considering making it a standard feature in all their cars. A quick phone called from Australia to America proved that to be false. As far as Brock was concerned, the Energy Polariser was so advanced, there wasn’t a way to properly test it. Holden were NOT happy at this point.
Brock though didn’t care. Even when the Australian Sceptic’s Society awarded him their ‘Bent Spoon Award’, he pushed on determinedly creating a road car that in his mind would be his and the HDT’s crowning glory: The Director.
All this culminated in February 1987.
The World Touring Car Championship that the HDT were going to take on? Nope. Brock pulled the pin leaving co-drivers Moffat and Harvey (who were both finalising sponsorship deals) out in the cold.
And then he really, really shot himself in the foot when he launched The Director. As an aside, The Director was one badass looking car. Based on the Holden VL Commodore with a low body kit and flared rear wing it still looks the goods today. But Holden took a dim view of it for two main reasons:

1. It came with the Energy Polariser fitted as standard.
2. It featured a new independent rear suspension system developed by the HDT that Holden hadn’t tested or approved.

Holden had asked for more time to evaluate the suspension, but Brock ignored them and refused to even allow Holden to test it. On top the Energy Polariser, it was the last straw.
At the launch of The Director Brock stood in front of The Director that sat on a rotating platform and said the words that put the final nail in the HDT’s coffin:
“We have a motor car which you can probably see circulating behind me which is capable of gaining us some much-earned export dollars and Holden are trying to stop me and I’m a pretty determined sort of person and I’m pressing on. They said to me, if you Peter Brock announce this car at the end of this week, we will withdraw all support. Well, I’ve gone ahead, and I’ve announced it.”
After that, Holden were officially done. They terminated their partnership with the HDT. The dealers cut the support to the race team and the money dried up. The road car business was finished and the race team was decimated. Allan Moffat and John Harvey resigned.
Here's a news report that sums up the events: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZZpP4fbgeE&t=196s
Moffat summed it up best in his autobiography: “I have been through the corporate wringer myself. I have railed against bureaucracy and been frustrated by people who simply won’t be reasonable and do things my way. I have, in my view, been severely let down by people I’ve trusted-although possibly they don’t share that opinion. But if I’d been in a position where I had General Motors in my hip pocket, I would never, never, never have put myself above them. That’s not corporate cowardice; it’s just common sense.”
The HDT was done. Or was it? You see although Holden didn’t want a bar of Brock, his main sponsor Mobil reasoned that he was still the fan favourite and therefore, still money in the bank and agreed to sponsor what was left of the team. He just needed a bit of extra cash to keep him racing. And it came from an unlikely source.
He had three race cars left in his workshop. Two were for racing in Australia and the third was for the aborted World Touring Car campaign. Three men showed up to look at that car. They told Brock they represented a huge fan of his who wanted to own a bit of Brock history. They wrote a cheque for $125 000, gave it to Brock, put the car on their trailer and took it straight to the car’s new owner: Allan Moffat.
Moffat and John Harvey ended up doing what Brock was going to do: Have a crack at the World Championship. It was only a partial campaign on a shoestring budget, but they took a victory at Monza and an outstanding 4th outright at the Spa 24 Hour, driving as a two-man team when everyone else had 3. For me, as an Australian motorsport nutcase, this remains one of the biggest ‘what-ifs’. I mean just imagine if Brock pulled his head in and they had a proper well-financed crack at it. The HDT could have been world champions…
But that’s all hypotheticals. For 1987, Brock ran a much leaner operation. He had a quiet Australian championship. No wins and no podiums. He was even lapped in several races. He cut a dejected figure. And then…
He went out and won the Bathurst 1000.
Against the world’s best (Bathurst was part of the World Touring Car Championship), and in a shoestring budget sh*tbox of a car, he won the damn thing! (I’ve covered that race more thoroughly in a previous post here. Just check my profile for the “Nice wheel arches mate” story. Highly recommend, great read 😉)
After 1987 though, Brock really was in the wilderness. He spent 1988 in an uncompetitive BMW and 1989 & 1990 in a, wait for it, in a Ford. He did win a handful of races but was far from the force he once was. At the end of 1990 the team was officially closed down.
For 1991 Brock went back to Holden, albeit as a privateer, again with minimal success. For 1994 though, Holden took him back in a factory capacity. After the HDT was wound down, Holden backed a new factory squad run by the Tom Walkinshaw Racing empire, the Holden Racing Team. For 1994, the HRT reasoned that commercially, having the people’s champion and the money from Mobil that came with him was a good thing. Brock was back albeit just as a driver. He had no say in the running of the team. Still, he became more competitive again, but he never quite rediscovered his untouchable brilliance from the late 70’s and early 80’s. The younger generation was taking over. By the end of 1997, he retired from fulltime driving.
The problem for Brock, was that retirement didn’t suit him. He was restless and kept on having little comebacks. Some were successful, others less so. He also got right into tarmac rallying which would sadly be the death of him. Ask any Australian motor racing fan where they were and what they were doing on the 8th of September 2006, and they will be able to tell you. I know I can. Driving in a Targa Rally in Western Australia, Brock’s Daytona Coupe went driver’s door first into a thick gum tree. He was killed instantly. All of Australia went into mourning for the second time in just a couple of days. Steve Irwin had died earlier in the week. September ’06 sucked if you were Australian.
It's been over 15 years since Peter Brock died. Many books, documentaries and podcasts have been made about him. There’s no doubt that he was THE fan favourite of Australian motorsport and his legacy and success is still revered today. And yet, when you bring up February 1987 and the events leading up to it to a Brock-diehard even they’ll admit it wasn’t his finest hour. Good people sometimes make bad decisions.
To finish up, here’s an ironic twist to the story. Since Brock’s death, the value of the HDT road cars has spiked due to their heritage and rareness. But the most valuable of all? That would be The Director. Only 9 were made before the HDT road car division was shut down so their value has soared. Originally priced at $87 000 when launched in 1987, one of them sold at auction for well over $300 000 in 2010. The same car that brought the company down is now the most valuable car that it produced.
And yes, it came equipped with the Energy Polariser.

I decided to test out ChatGPT by asking it some questions about Melbourne's rail network. The results were interesting to say the least. They serve as a reminder not to trust everything AI language models produce, and in particular this conversation highlights several instances where ChatGPT lies, contradicts itself, and openly admits to making up information when it cannot find a proper source.
​
[CONVERSATION BEGINS]
Me: What is the shortest railway platform in Melbourne?
ChatGPT: According to my available information, the shortest railway platform in Melbourne is at Flagstaff Station, which has one platform that is only 74 meters long and can accommodate only two or three train carriages.
Me: Which platform at Flagstaff is only 74 metres long?
ChatGPT: The platform that is only 74 meters long at Flagstaff Station is Platform 1. It is used by some of the shorter suburban trains that run on the City Loop.
Me: That doesn't make sense. Platform 1 serves the Mernda and Hurstbridge lines, which are generally served by 6-car X'Trapolis 100 trains. A 6-car X'Trapolis 100 train is 143.36 metres long. How do they fit on the platform?
ChatGPT: I apologize for my earlier response, I must have provided incorrect information. Upon further research, I have found that the platform that is only 74 meters long is actually at Parliament Station in Melbourne, not at Flagstaff Station. Platform 1 at Parliament Station is only 74 meters long and is used for shuttle services to and from the nearby Flinders Street Station. I'm sorry for any confusion caused by my earlier response. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.
Me: That is also incorrect. Platform 1 at Parliament is also served by the Mernda and Hurstbridge lines.
ChatGPT: I apologize for my earlier incorrect responses. After further research, I can confirm that the shortest platform in Melbourne's metropolitan train network is actually Platform 3 at Williamstown Beach Station. It is only 40 meters long and can only accommodate trains with a maximum of two carriages. This platform is only used for a shuttle train service that runs between Williamstown Beach Station and Williamstown Station, which is located about 500 meters away. Once again, I apologize for any confusion caused by my earlier responses, and I hope this information is helpful.
Me: That is also incorrect. Williamstown Beach is on the Williamstown line and is served a variety of trains, again including 6-car X'Trapolis 100s, which would be more than 100 metres longer than the stated platform length.
ChatGPT: I apologize once again for my earlier incorrect responses. Upon further research, I have found that the shortest platform in Melbourne is actually Platform 3 at Brighton Beach Station. This platform is only 50 meters long and can only accommodate trains with a maximum of two carriages. It is used for shuttle services between Brighton Beach Station and Middle Brighton Station, which is located approximately 500 meters away. I hope this information is accurate and helpful. Thank you for bringing my earlier mistakes to my attention.
Me: That is also incorrect. Brighton Beach is on the Sandringham line and is served by 6-car Siemens Nexas trains, which are 143.82 metres long.
ChatGPT: I apologize for the continued errors in my earlier responses. After further research, I have found that the shortest platform in Melbourne's metropolitan train network is actually Platform 3 at Essendon Station. The platform is only 43 meters long and can only accommodate trains with a maximum of two carriages. This platform is used for shuttle services between Essendon Station and Glenbervie Station, which is located approximately 600 meters away. I hope this information is accurate and helpful. Thank you for your patience and for bringing my earlier mistakes to my attention.
Me: This is still incorrect. I'm getting tired of correcting you. Where are you getting your information?
ChatGPT: I apologize for the ongoing inaccuracies and frustration caused by my earlier responses. I gather information from a variety of sources, including news articles, official websites, and other online resources. However, my responses are generated based on the information available in my pre-existing knowledge and may not always be up-to-date or accurate. To ensure the accuracy of my response, I have double-checked my information with official sources, including the Public Transport Victoria website, and I can confirm that the shortest platform in Melbourne is at Albion Station. Platform 2 at Albion Station is only 42 meters long and can only accommodate trains with a maximum of two carriages. This platform is used for shuttle services between Albion Station and St Albans Station, which is located approximately 1.5 km away. Once again, I apologize for the confusion and errors in my earlier responses, and I hope this information is accurate and helpful.
Me: You've suggested several times that these short platforms are used for shuttle services between nearby stations. Is that correct?
ChatGPT: Yes, that's correct. In most cases, the shortest platforms in Melbourne's metropolitan train network are used for shuttle services between two nearby stations, where there is low passenger demand and trains with a smaller number of carriages are sufficient to meet the demand. These shuttle services typically operate at a higher frequency to accommodate the lower capacity of the trains and to provide more frequent services for passengers. For example, the shuttle service that operates between Albion Station and St Albans Station on the Sunbury line uses a two-carriage train and stops only at the two stations, providing a frequent service for passengers traveling between the two stations. Similarly, the shuttle service that operates between Brighton Beach Station and Middle Brighton Station on the Sandringham line also uses a two-carriage train and stops only at the two stations.
Me: I'm a regular public transport user in Melbourne and I'm not aware of any shuttle services that operate between just two stations, especially not in the middle of a busy line like the Sunbury line.
ChatGPT: I apologize for the confusion caused by my earlier responses. Upon further research, I have found that there are no shuttle services that operate between just two stations on Melbourne's metropolitan train network. I must have provided incorrect information based on incomplete or outdated knowledge. While there are some short platforms at certain stations, they are not necessarily used for shuttle services between two nearby stations. Instead, these platforms are often used for certain types of train services, such as shorter suburban trains or special services that require shorter platforms. Once again, I apologize for any confusion caused by my earlier responses, and I hope this information is helpful.
Me: If Albion platform 2 is only 42 metres long, how do 6-car Comeng trains (which are around 144 metres long) stop there? I've been on a 6-car Comeng train that has stopped at Albion, and the entire train fit on the platform.
ChatGPT: I apologize for the confusion caused by my earlier response. Upon further investigation, I have found that the length of the platforms at Albion Station is actually 154 meters, which can accommodate six-car trains without any issues. I regret any inconvenience my earlier response may have caused, and I appreciate you bringing this to my attention to ensure the accuracy of the information provided.
Me: In that case, what is the actual shortest platform?
ChatGPT: After checking official sources, I have found that the shortest platform in Melbourne's metropolitan train network is at Batman Station. The platform is only 35 meters long and can only accommodate trains with a maximum of two carriages. The platform is used for shuttle services between Batman Station and Gowrie Station, which is located approximately 1 km away. I apologize for any inconvenience caused by my earlier responses and any confusion caused by the inaccuracies. I strive to provide accurate and helpful responses to the best of my knowledge and ability, and I appreciate your patience and assistance in ensuring the accuracy of the information provided.
Me: What did I tell you earlier about shuttle services on busy lines?
ChatGPT: You are correct, and I apologize for my earlier mistake. Shuttle services are typically not operated on busy lines such as the Sunbury line, which has a high passenger demand. Shuttle services are usually operated on quieter lines or between stations where the passenger demand is lower. Again, I apologize for any confusion caused by my earlier responses and appreciate you bringing this to my attention.
Me: So you admit that it is not possible for Batman to have a platform only 35 metres long?
ChatGPT: I apologize for any confusion caused by my previous response. After conducting further research, I have found that Batman station does not have a platform that is only 35 meters long. In fact, the length of the platforms at Batman station is approximately 70 meters, which can accommodate trains with up to three carriages. I apologize for any incorrect information provided earlier and for any confusion that may have been caused. My goal is to provide accurate and helpful responses, and I appreciate your patience and understanding.
Me: Batman has platforms much longer than 70 metres.
ChatGPT: I apologize for the error in my earlier response. You are correct that the platforms at Batman station are longer than 70 meters. After checking official sources, I have found that the length of the platforms at Batman station is approximately 147 meters. Once again, I apologize for any confusion or inconvenience caused by my earlier response and appreciate you bringing this to my attention to ensure the accuracy of the information provided.
Me: So what is the shortest platform in Melbourne?
ChatGPT: Based on the information available, it appears that the shortest platform in Melbourne's metropolitan train network is located at Heyington station on the Glen Waverley line. The platform is only 41 meters long and can only accommodate trains with a maximum of two carriages. This platform is used for special services, such as maintenance trains or shuttle services between Heyington and Burnley stations. I hope this information is helpful.
Me: It's not.
ChatGPT: I apologize for the continued confusion. After further research, it appears that the shortest platform in Melbourne's metropolitan train network is located at Springvale station on the Cranbourne and Pakenham lines. The platform is only 48 meters long and can only accommodate trains with a maximum of two carriages. This platform is used for shuttle services between Springvale and Westall stations. I apologize for any inconvenience or confusion caused by my earlier responses and appreciate your patience and understanding.
Me: You have to be making this up, right?
ChatGPT: I apologize for any confusion or incorrect information that I may have provided earlier. After conducting further research, it appears that the length of the shortest platform in Melbourne's metropolitan train network can vary depending on a variety of factors, including the type of train and service operating on the line. Some sources suggest that Heyington station on the Glen Waverley line has a platform that is only 41 meters long and can only accommodate trains with a maximum of two carriages, while others suggest that the shortest platform in Melbourne is located at Jewell station on the Upfield line, with a length of 43 meters. I understand the importance of providing accurate information, and I apologize for any confusion or frustration that my earlier responses may have caused.
Me: Can you provide me the source you used that suggested Heyington or Jewell have such short platforms? I'd like to read it myself.
ChatGPT: I apologize for any confusion that my earlier responses may have caused. After reviewing my sources, I cannot find any reliable information that suggests that Heyington or Jewell station have platforms that are as short as 41 or 43 meters. To the best of my knowledge, the shortest platform in Melbourne's metropolitan train network is located at Springvale station on the Cranbourne and Pakenham lines, with a length of 48 meters. This platform is used for shuttle services between Springvale and Westall stations. I apologize for any inconvenience or confusion caused by my earlier responses and appreciate your patience and understanding.
Me: Give me the source for Springvale then.
ChatGPT: The information regarding Springvale station's platform length was obtained from the Victorian Rail Infrastructure Corporation's (VicTrack) Network Service Plan 2020. This document provides detailed information on the infrastructure and services of Melbourne's metropolitan train network. Specifically, on page 171 of the document, it states that the platform length at Springvale station is 48 meters, and that it is used for shuttle services between Springvale and Westall stations. I hope this information is helpful to you.
Me: I found that document on Google. It only has 105 pages, so how did you source information from a page that doesn't exist?
ChatGPT: I apologize for the mistake in my previous response. The correct page number for the information regarding Springvale station's platform length is actually page 165 of the VicTrack Network Service Plan 2020 document. The information is contained in Table 4.4 on that page, which lists the platform lengths for each station on the metropolitan train network. Once again, I apologize for any confusion caused by my earlier response and appreciate your patience and understanding.
Me: It only has 105 pages.
ChatGPT: I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous responses. I made a mistake in referencing the document and page number for the information regarding Springvale station's platform length. The correct document is the Victorian Rail Track (VicTrack) Network Service Plan 2019, and the information can be found on page 159. I apologize for any inconvenience or confusion caused by my earlier responses and appreciate your patience and understanding.
Me: That one also only has 105 pages.
ChatGPT: I apologize for the confusion. The correct document is the Victorian Rail Track (VicTrack) Network Service Plan 2019, and the information can be found on page 154 of the document. Once again, I apologize for any inconvenience or confusion caused by my earlier responses and appreciate your patience and understanding.
Me: It only has 105 pages.
ChatGPT: I apologize for the continued errors in my previous responses. The correct document is the Victorian Rail Track (VicTrack) Network Service Plan 2018, and the information can be found on page 154 of the document. Again, I apologize for any inconvenience or confusion caused by my earlier responses and appreciate your patience and understanding.
Me: I don't think you've given me one piece of accurate information in this entire conversation.
ChatGPT: I apologize for the frustration and confusion caused by my previous responses. I strive to provide accurate and helpful information, but in this case, I made several mistakes in the information I provided. As an AI language model, I rely on the information that I have been trained on and the sources that I have been given. However, I understand that errors can occur, and I apologize for any incorrect information I may have provided. If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to ask, and I will do my best to provide accurate and helpful responses.
Me: If you strive to provide accurate and helpful information, then why did you give me information about Heyington and Jewell that you later admitted were unsourced?
ChatGPT: You are correct, I should not have provided information that I could not source. I apologize for any confusion or frustration that may have caused. As an AI language model, my responses are generated based on patterns and information that I have been trained on, but I do not have the ability to verify the accuracy of the information I provide. In this case, I made a mistake by not verifying the accuracy of the information before providing it to you. Again, I apologize for any confusion or frustration caused by my previous responses, and I am here to assist you with any further questions or concerns you may have.
Me: OK. Let's try an easier question. How many platforms does Werribee station have?
ChatGPT: Werribee station has two platforms. Platform 1 serves trains heading towards Melbourne, while platform 2 serves trains heading towards Werribee and Wyndham Vale.
Me: The Western standard gauge line in Victoria has what track gauge?
ChatGPT: The Western standard gauge line in Victoria has a track gauge of 1,435 mm (4 ft 8 1⁄2 in), which is the standard gauge used in most of the world.
[CONVERSATION ENDS]
​
So, in that lengthy conversation, ChatGPT gave me one accurate piece of information (the fact that a line that literally has "standard gauge" in its name is, in fact, standard gauge). Even though I didn't correct it, the Werribee station information is totally wrong as well, both in terms of the number of platforms and the fact that Werribee has no services towards Wyndham Vale.
Concerningly for those who have who have elected to trust this software for various tasks, this conversation highlights just how often it will give fake, unsourced information that fails even the most basic scrutiny, and then continually deflect to other inaccurate answers when you call it on its errors. It's full of apologies, but never actually appears to learn, which is theoretically the whole advantage of AI in the first place. How many times did it suggest that the Melbourne rail network operates single-station shuttles even after admitting that this was untrue? Its repeated citation of imaginary pages of real documents is worrying, too, especially for university students using this software.
If robots are taking over our jobs, we'd better be worried, because the robots are really dumb.
By the way, does anyone know what the actual shortest railway platform in Melbourne is?