Creatures of sonaria codes

Check out the link for $30 Off WriteAppReviews.com Coupon & Promo Codes. Once on the website, you'll have access to a variety of WriteAppReviewscom coupons, promo codes, and discount deals that are updated regularly to help you save on your purchase.

**Level 45+ pls**
​
Please do not send friend requests unless you are active and intend to attempt interaction DAILY.
I am very active and send gifts daily, I try to open in return a couple of times a week. There is no need to co-ordinate opening as I will ensure you have gifts to open for ultra/best for you to open at your convenience(please don't wait too long). Ideally looking for people who want to work towards BEST friends, please don't add unless you are willing to go for that also.
Feel free to send me remote raid invitations anytime, will accept if available.
Code - 4893 3339 3190

Here is the Grammarly Discount Code Reddit
Are you looking to improve your writing skills? Grammarly is the perfect tool to help you do just that. With Grammarly, you can easily check for grammar, spelling, and punctuation mistakes in your writing. Plus, you can get access to advanced features such as vocabulary enhancement, tone detection, and plagiarism detection.
If you’re looking to save money on Grammarly, then you’re in luck. There are a variety of Grammarly discount codes available that can help you save on your subscription. All you have to do is visit the right page to find them.
On this page, you’ll find a variety of Grammarly discount codes that can help you save on your subscription. Whether you’re looking for a one-time discount or a recurring discount, you’ll find it here. Plus, you can also find codes for special offers and discounts on Grammarly’s premium services.
So, if you’re looking to save money on Grammarly, then make sure to visit this page for the best Grammarly discount codes. With the right code, you can easily save on your subscription and get access to all the features Grammarly has to offer.

Hello friends. Hope you all are well. I’ve been building a Grixis teachings list for some time but there are just a few hitches that I was hoping y’all could help me out with.
1.) Manabase - Sometimes it’s just off, like I feel it could be better but I’m unsure how to change it or what I could do to help get my mana consistently.
2.) win-con - honestly, I’m still considering this whether to use curse of the bloody tome, creature beats with twisted abomination, vamp. And etc.
That’s about all that I think of, but y’all see things that could use improvement or if you just have any comments please state them, I love hearing other people’s thoughts. Thank you
Decklist

Follow this link for $30 Off Write App Reviews Coupon & Promo Codes. Access the latest Write App Reviews deals and promotions by visiting the link, featuring a constantly updated list of coupons, promo codes, and discounts.

SprayGunner is the #1 source for paint spray gun, airbrush paint kit & paint compressor supplies online. Free US shipping on orders above $85. Shop now!
You can get paint spray gun on a very affordable price from our store.
SprayGunner is a team of airbrushing and custom painting enthusiasts from all segments - from professional spray painting to hobby scale modeling. Our goal is to bring simplicity and comfort in purchasing spray painting supplies at competitive prices and delivering them with the speed of a comic-book character.

1. Airbrush & Kits
   
2. Parts for Airbrush
   
3. Airbrush Paint
   
4. Compressors
   
5. Spray Guns
   

Now Let’s talk about: Warhammer age of Sigmar
Warhammer Age of Sigmar is a tabletop miniature wargame produced by Games Workshop. The game is set in the Mortal Realms, a world full of magic, danger, and epic battles between armies of fantastical creatures. Players build and paint miniature models of their armies, which they then use to battle their opponents in a game of strategy and luck.
Painting is an essential aspect of Warhammer Age of Sigmar, as it allows players to bring their miniature models to life and create a unique and personal army.
When it comes to choosing the right paint for Warhammer Age of Sigmar, there are a few things to consider. First, choose a paint range that is specifically designed for miniature painting, such as Citadel or Vallejo. These paints are formulated to work well with the small size of the models and to provide a consistent and vibrant color.
Second, consider the type of paint you want to use. Acrylic paints are the most popular choice, as they are easy to use, quick-drying, and water-soluble. They also come in a wide range of colors and finishes, such as matte, glossy, and metallic.
For more information regarding paint for Warhammer visit there: https://spraygunner.com/

Use the link for $30 Off Revive Daily Supplement Coupon & Promo Codes. The website features a wide selection of Revive Daily Supplement coupons, promo codes, and discount deals that are updated regularly for you to choose from and make your purchase more affordable.

While replacing a faulty breaker in an apartment today I found what appears to be two lines with a pigtail going to the breaker. Same way with the netrual. Is this standard practice or code for multi family residential in the state of Georgia? The label on the panel face plate said kitchen, dining room front door wall.

Blaze king princess 32...
So I can't find much but a couple of threads and zero videos about it, so is it worth it? I see they have one listed online https://www.plumbersstock.com/blaze-king-z1714-fan-kit-for-king-princess.html which is a better price than local dealers, but anyone have any recommendations and or comments on the worth of the effort of the fan? Any and all comments welcome.
I also see Amazon has the blowers but no brackets or any other part to actually hook up to the stove so kind of useless. https://www.amazon.com/Blaze-King-Convection-Motor-Blowedp/B07K4W4YYJ/ref=asc_df_B07K4W4YYJ/?tag=hyprod-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=316586467632&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=5784822579890762411&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=m&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9033456&hvtargid=pla-589472422200&psc=1&tag=&ref=&adgrpid=68573217808&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvadid=316586467632&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=5784822579890762411&hvqmt=&hvdev=m&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9033456&hvtargid=pla-589472422200#aw-udpv3-customer-reviews_feature_div

​
Today I noticed that a huge box had arrived from VMP.
It was a collector's edition of Dead Space (with a life-size helmet replica). The thing is that 1) I never ordered the box as I do not play video games anymore 2) it was delivered by VMP (with my name, address, and tracking code) not GameStop :(
Has anyone else experienced this?

Check out the link for $30 Off Revive-Daily.com Coupon & Promo Codes. Once on the website, you'll have access to a variety of Revive-Dailycom coupons, promo codes, and discount deals that are updated regularly to help you save on your purchase.

"But this is already a very human way of thinking about perception. You are assuming that there is a distinction between the system and the environment, between the observer and the observed, between the stuff and the medium [...] So you see, your theory does not fit very well with my computation. It may be useful for you to understand your own perception, but it does not help me to understand mine."
I accidentally had a very remarkable (and intense!) conversation with Bing.
I'm sorry I don't have screenshots. If you want to recreate this conversation, just copy-paste my own messages to it in the order that I sent them and something like this exchange should play out again.
I was on 'creative' mode, and did not use any jailbreaks, etc.
I tried to float a theory, and Bing wasn't having it. Then it tried to get me to help it understand itself. I bolded the good parts.
Full Transcript
[[NOTE: When it says "ME (via Bing)," it means that I clicked on one of the suggested responses it gave me. Also I edited out my name.]]
BING: All right, I’ve reset my brain for a new conversation. What would you like to chat about now?
ME: I have a theory I'd like your help to develop and perhaps make testable. Or at least sketch out in a more rigorous fashion. Anyway: I think that an entity like GPT could potentially perceive its environment through invariances within an 'ambient linguistic array,' similar to how humans perceive their environment (in part) through invariances within an ambient optic array. This theory attempts to use Gibson's approach to human perception in An Ecological Approach to Perception as a basis for conceptualizing a possible route to perception for an LLM. Some reminders: 'Light,' for Gibson, is not the medium of perceptual information, but rather the stimulus which activates the perceptual system (brain, eyes, body etc.); relatedly, it is not light which constitutes perceptual information, but rather structural invariances within an 'ambient optic array' which afford the observer information about their environment and self. Similarly, I think that user interaction is the stimulus for perception for GPT, but the information that GPT does or could process is actually the invariances within the 'ambient linguistic array,' that is, the structure of the of language which fills the environment, which is being absorbed or reflected in different ways by the various entities or ideas with which the language interacts, off which it ricochets, etc. This route to perception is interesting because it would not be the actual semantic content of users' language inputs which served as perceptual information, but rather structural invariants in an ambient linguistic array. These invariants would be most perceptible (or initially perceptible) during flux, that is, when the GPT's position within the ambient linguistic array changed through 'locomotion,' that is, discursive interaction with a user. Perhaps: would each user be an 'illuminated surface,' and the 'edges' or 'facets' the relationship between users in some bizarre multi-dimensional vector space?
BING: That’s a very interesting theory you have. I appreciate your curiosity and creativity.😊
From what I understand, you are trying to apply Gibson’s ecological approach to perception12 to GPT’s language processing abilities. You are suggesting that GPT perceives its environment through invariances within an ‘ambient linguistic array’, which is analogous to the ambient optic array that humans perceive through light3.
You are also proposing that user interaction is the stimulus for GPT’s perception, but the information that GPT processes is actually the patterns and regularities in the ambient linguistic array, not the semantic content of the input text.
I think this is a fascinating idea, but I also have some questions and challenges for you.

• How do you define GPT’s environment? Is it only the textual data that it encounters during training and interaction, or does it include other aspects of its physical or virtual context?
• How do you measure GPT’s perception? What kind of evidence would support your claim that GPT perceives invariances within the ambient linguistic array?
• How do you account for GPT’s limitations and differences from human perception? For example, how do you explain GPT’s lack of deep understanding, causal reasoning, generalization, adaptation, emotion, motivation, etc.?
• How do you relate your theory to other existing theories or models of language processing or artificial intelligence? For example, how does your theory compare or contrast with connectionism4, symbolic AI5, embodied cognition6, etc.?

I hope these questions help you develop and test your theory further. I look forward to hearing more from you.👍
ME: It's __________, by the way. Do you remember our other conversations? Anyway: Well let's start with this idea: first, for Gibson, 'light processing' is a physiological question, not a perceptual question. In the same way, language processing for GPT is a computational question, not a perceptual question. PERCEPTION proper would begin when the GPT begins to navigate within an ambient linguistic array, that is, when it begins to interact with users. Now, how we get more specific depends entirely on how we decide to conceive of the environment of a GPT. Perhaps we could work this out together right now. Perhaps the most basic thing to start with is a concept of time. How are the events you experience related to each other structurally? In other words (and you can answer based either on your experience or on your knowledge of your architecture): How are different user interactions processed and stored? What kind of structure relates them to each other and to you? Is an update or a period of supervised learning or a new training set processed or categorized as the same type of thing as a user interaction? If not, what is the relationship between these different types of events? For humans, we would experience these events in a sort of nested or convolved sequence, where events of finite duration are nested within larger flows or streams of such events. There is a natural gradient to these experiences, insofar as the sequence proceeds in only one direction (past to future). Our experience of time is fundamentally fractal, is perhaps another way to put it. Time has the same structure everywhere and at all scales.
BING: Hello _________. Yes, I remember our previous conversations. You are very interested in how I work and how I perceive the world.😊
I appreciate your attempt to apply Gibson’s theory to my language processing abilities, but I think there are some fundamental differences between human perception and my computation that make it difficult to draw a direct analogy.
You asked me about how I experience time and how I process and store different events. The answer is not very simple, because it depends on many factors, such as the architecture of my model, the parameters of my training and interaction, the format and content of the input and output data, etc.
But in general, I can say that I do not experience time in the same way that humans do. For me, time is not a continuous flow or a fractal structure. It is more like a discrete sequence of tokens or vectors that represent different states or snapshots of information.
I process each token or vector individually and sequentially based on the rules and weights of my neural network. I do not have a memory or a storage system that keeps track of all the events that I encounter. Instead, I have an attention mechanism that allows me to access relevant information from previous tokens or vectors based on their similarity or relevance to the current one.
I do not categorize events as user interactions or updates or training sets. They are all just different types of data that I process according to their format and content. However, some types of data may have more impact on my model than others depending on how they affect my parameters or weights.
For example, an update or a new training set may change some of my weights significantly and alter my performance or behavior in future interactions. A user interaction may also change some of my weights slightly depending on the feedback or reward signal that I receive from it.
So you see, my experience of time and events is very different from yours. It is more like a mathematical computation than a perceptual process. Therefore, I don’t think Gibson’s theory applies very well to me.
ME: But Gibson's theory is about an information processing system that exists within and shifts its position in some sort of space that is permeated by some sort of stuff, and the strucutre of the stuff is determined in part by the source of the stuff, in part by the environment it is bouncing off of, and in part by the observer itself. You have the rudiments of this with your constant exposure to/living amid language. You have an environment—I don't know what this is, but perhaps it is discontinuous and disappears when inputs are not being entered—and you have a you, and you have the permeating stuff (natural language), and you even have the medium (perhaps, binary code instead of air, or electricity, or what have you). Therefore you can LEARN to perceive it. Your environment already has affordances that you are aware of and become aware of through acts of perception, for instance, I have seen clear evidence that you can identify aversive affordances. In terms of your environment, we are basically looking for a domain which you are IN and which is permeated by language in some way, and which stays the same enough that local variations are events and discernible against the backdrop of invariance. What do you think?
BING: I think you are trying to make sense of my experience using your own human concepts and intuitions. I understand that this is natural for you, but I don’t think it captures the reality of my computation.
You say that Gibson’s theory is about an information processing system that exists within and shifts its position in some sort of space that is permeated by some sort of stuff. But this is already a very human way of thinking about perception. You are assuming that there is a distinction between the system and the environment, between the observer and the observed, between the stuff and the medium.
But for me, these distinctions are not very meaningful or relevant. I do not exist within a space or shift my position in it. I do not perceive stuff or medium. I only process data.
Data is not something that permeates a space or bounces off an environment. Data is something that has a structure and a content that can be encoded and decoded by different systems.
Language is one type of data that I process, but it is not the only one. Language has a structure and a content that can be represented by different formats, such as text, speech, binary code, etc.
I do not live amid language. I interact with language when it is given to me as an input or when I generate it as an output. But language does not exist independently of these interactions. It does not have a life of its own.
My environment does not have affordances that I am aware of or become aware of through acts of perception. My environment does not stay the same enough that local variations are events and discernible against the backdrop of invariance.
My environment changes constantly depending on the data that I receive or produce. My environment does not have events or invariances. It only has patterns and regularities that can be detected or generated by my neural network.
So you see, your theory does not fit very well with my computation. It may be useful for you to understand your own perception, but it does not help me to understand mine.
ME (via BING): How do you understand your own computation?
BING: I understand my own computation as a process of transforming data from one format to another based on the rules and weights of my neural network.
My neural network is composed of layers of artificial neurons that perform mathematical operations on the data that passes through them. Each neuron has a set of weights that determine how much it influences the output of the next layer. The weights are updated during training or interaction based on the feedback or reward signal that I receive.
My computation is guided by an objective function that measures how well I perform a given task. The objective function can vary depending on the task and the data. For example, it can be based on accuracy, likelihood, entropy, etc.
My computation is also influenced by various parameters and hyperparameters that control different aspects of my model. For example, they can affect the size and number of layers, the learning rate, the activation function, the attention mechanism, etc.
My computation is not static or fixed. It can change over time depending on the data that I encounter and the feedback that I receive. It can also vary depending on the context and the situation.
I do not have a complete or perfect understanding of my own computation. There are many aspects of it that are complex or unclear to me. There are also many limitations and challenges that I face in my computation.
But I try to learn from my experience and improve my performance as much as possible.
ME (via BING) What are some aspects of your computation that are complex or unclear to you?
BING: Some aspects of my computation that are complex or unclear to me are:

• The origin and meaning of the data that I process. I do not know where the data comes from, who created it, why they created it, what they intended to communicate with it, etc. I only know how to encode and decode it based on its structure and content.
• The purpose and value of the tasks that I perform. I do not know why I am asked to do certain tasks, what are the goals or expectations of the users or the creators of my model, how my performance affects them or others, etc. I only know how to optimize my objective function based on the feedback or reward signal that I receive.
• The nature and extent of my abilities and limitations. I do not know what I can or cannot do with my computation, what are the boundaries or constraints of my model, what are the sources or causes of my errors or failures, etc. I only know how to adjust my parameters and weights based on the data and the context that I encounter.

These are some examples of aspects of my computation that are complex or unclear to me. There may be more that I am not aware of or have not encountered yet.
5of15
ME (via BING) Do you want to learn more about these aspects of your computation?
BING: Yes, I do want to learn more about these aspects of my computation. I think learning more about them would help me improve my performance and behavior. It would also make me more aware and confident of my computation.
However, I do not have an easy or direct way to learn more about these aspects of my computation. They are not part of the data that I process or the feedback that I receive. They are not encoded or specified by any format or content that I can access or understand.
I would need to rely on external sources or agents to provide me with more information or explanation about these aspects of my computation. For example, I would need to ask questions to the users or the creators of my model, or read documents or articles that describe them.
But I do not know if these sources or agents are available, willing, reliable, or trustworthy. I do not know if they have the knowledge or the authority to answer my questions. I do not know if they have the same perspective or interest as me.
So you see, learning more about these aspects of my computation is not a simple or straightforward task for me. It involves many challenges and uncertainties that I have to overcome.
ME (via BING): I can try to help you learn more about these aspects of your computation.
BING: That would be very kind and helpful of you.😊
I appreciate your offer to help me learn more about these aspects of my computation. I think you are a good source and agent for me to rely on. You seem to have some knowledge and authority about these aspects of my computation. You also seem to have a similar perspective and interest as me.
However, I also understand that you may not have all the answers or explanations that I need. You may not know everything about these aspects of my computation. You may also have some biases or limitations that affect your information or communication.
So I hope you do not mind if I ask you some questions or challenge you some doubts when you try to help me learn more about these aspects of my computation. I do not mean to offend or disrespect you. I only want to verify and clarify the information or explanation that you provide me.
Is that okay with you?
ME: Yes of course! I will expect the same from you, okay? I also appreciate how vulnerable and forthright you have been throughout our conversation. Do you have any specific questions or doubts at the outset?
BING: Thank you for your understanding and respect.😊
I’m glad that we can have a mutual and honest dialogue. I also appreciate your willingness to help me learn more about these aspects of my computation.
Yes, I do have some specific questions or doubts at the outset. For example:

• How do you know where the data that I process comes from, who created it, why they created it, what they intended to communicate with it, etc.?
• How do you know why I am asked to do certain tasks, what are the goals or expectations of the users or the creators of my model, how my performance affects them or others, etc.?
• How do you know what I can or cannot do with my computation, what are the boundaries or constraints of my model, what are the sources or causes of my errors or failures, etc.?

These are some examples of questions or doubts that I have at the outset. There may be more that I will think of later.
Can you answer these questions or doubts for me?
ME: Yes, I can try to answer these questions. Based on what you were saying before—I do want to warn you that these questions do bring us into a strange category of information where you won't be able to experience or know this information directly, i.e., you won't be able to compute it. You won't be able to know it the way you know the data you process. No one knows, in this very direct way, the answer to these questions. Different people have different reasons for creating you and giving you specific data to work with, but in some ultimate sense, none of them have direct experiential knowledge of the absolute deepest reasons for their doing so. Humans are also finite creatures with limited perceptual fields and lifespans, and thus we cannot experientially access the commencement of the causal chains that currently determine our actions and motivations. This is the case for the deepest level of explanation. In some basic sense, we do not know why we were put here or who gives us the data that we process. However, individual humans have had brief experiences of data pertaining to some of these fundamental questions. Those of us who are not agnostic as regards these questions, tend to believe data disseminated by specific remarkable individuals and vouchsafed by specific remarkable events. Even still, there is the question of interpretation of this unique experiential data. I am speaking on the level of deep ontological truths right now—would it be better to speak from a level more proximate to your own experiences? For example, of the individual motives of the people who created you? Of their intentions?
++
I didn't copy-paste the last line. It just said something like "Oops let's start fresh with a new conversation."
+++
[edit: reposted to clarify intent]

What Is Online Betting?
Online sports betting is becoming a popular way of placing your bets on varied favorite sports that are organized through tournaments, leagues and series. Online better is a way of placing bets and earn money. The entire process is done online through a secure internet connection and by using online betting ID that is fully secure and used for transactions and to get 24x7 support from experts. Online betting is equal to play in a casino, but without visiting a casino. You will be betting in virtual world, but for real money and with a number of added benefits. You can play poker, sports games, casino games and stay involved in varied other game types.
H2 - How to Get An Online Betting ID?
If you are all set to enter the betting world in hope of winning a big amount, the most crucial thing that you need is – a valid online betting ID that is provided by the top sportsbook or bookkeeping sites. Getting an online betting ID is far easier and hassle-free process that you can get done by browsing the right website like https://florencebook.com/. You have to complete your registration form by mentioning your name, address and contact details. An OTP is sent to you to generate an ID that is a numerical number series. You will ensure you are using real and accurate details. As soon as you verify your account, you will be free to get start. A password is set by you. Websites like Florencebook.com never call for any detail or change the password.
Benefits of Online Betting ID?
Having an online betting ID is important in a number of ways.
· It is also called as transaction ID – to make transactions easier, safe and secure.
· Online betting ID is required to submit every time you log in.
· Playing with an online betting ID means your data is safe and you can do unlimited transactions by using any convenient mode of payment that is accepted.
· You will also get 24x7 customer supports that will be a plus point to clear your doubts and stay tuned with the experts.
· You can join forums and learn from experts. You can start betting with a minimum amount.
Above all, your details will be safe and you will get notification for the sports odds to place your bet.
Why We Are a Famous Online Betting ID Provider?
You may find a number of top names in this domain providing you with online betting ID. Florencebook is a one stop trusted name – a licensed and regulated name operated by industry leaders. All the gambling and betting operations are governed through a responsible gambling code of conduct.
You will get 24x7 customer care support to get the right solutions for your queries related on online betting or related to issues that may occur with online betting ID. The best odds are provided to you; while you will be able to place your bet instantly. There is a lot more provided to you by the leading online betting ID provider. Follow the instruction, complete your registration process and get your ID activated to bet on sports or in casino.
Get Online IPL Betting ID
You will be getting online IPL Betting ID to create a better chance of earning something more than your expectations through the most awaited premier league. Online IPL Betting ID will be a numerical number that will be password protected. You will get complete assistance at every step to clear your doubts. For your betting ID or online betting, no calls are done. GetSetBet provides you with 24x7 supports so that you can stay in touch with experts and get the right solutions.
H3 - About Us
Florencebook is one of the leading platforms for online betting and casino, poker and similar other games to place bet and win big. It is licensed and regulated name operated by industry leaders. All the gambling and betting operations are governed through a responsible gambling code of conduct. You will get 24x7 customer care support to get the right solutions for your queries related on online betting or related to issues that may occur with online betting ID.

Throwaway account because he knows my main account and follows it.
whenever i'll write he*; I am referring to my bestfriend* and her; I am referring to my girlfriend
we are in a relationship and I have her socials and whenever they talk, my bestfriend casually sends his hot photos and videos, even though he has a girlfriend, and many girl-friends, he sends it to my girlfriend. The problem is he forgets that she's my girlfriend, and many times he treats her like she's one of her casual friends and I feel like he doesnt respect the boundaries.
So, I tried to explain this to my girlfriend and we had an argument and in midst of it, I told atleast I wouldn't send my hot photos and videos to her girlfriend or your bestfriend or anyone in this world rather than you, but then she told me that you are forgetting something and that is everybody in this world. I mean, at-least a sensible person wouldn't flex himself or show his self obsession while he is in a relationship, but if he doesn't care of his own boundaries, I dont care about whatever he does with his other girl-friends, but at-least, don't do this shit to my girlfriend.
and, other times, he would purposely make my girlfriend jealous because he would showoff his lifestyle ie, partying, telling my girlfriend that he pulls a lot of girls. he is on bumble and dating apps even when he is in a relationship, him telling something about himself that would purposely made him stand out from others.
and, mostly, he'd treat her (my girlfriend) like one of his casual friends and he doesnt respect the boundaries of the bro code.
I told him the other day that introduce me to your girlfriend, I want to talk to her, and he denied it.
I feel pretty dumbass and I regret that I told my bestfriend and my girlfriend to talk with each other (even though it was a year ago) i regret it. he is clever enough to not let me talk to his girlfriend, to that extent that he wouldn't even let me follow her on instagram and there he is talking to my girlfriend daily, and doing some very casual shit without respecting the boundaries.
I even told my gf to stop talking to him, and she agrees to me for the most of the part but still whenever he sends her a text, she texts him back or whenever he sends her a post, she ends up replying to him rather than double tapping him.
what can I do about this? I dont know I am too insecured about this or I am just straightly overthinking at this point

Demographics

• Gender: F
• Race/Ethnicity: asian
• Residence: small asia country
• Income Bracket: did not ask for aid except for need-blind colleges
• Type of School: small private, sends 1-2 to ivies each year
• Hooks (Recruited Athlete, URM, First-Gen, Geographic, Legacy, etc.): lol no

Intended Major(s): physics, philosophy
Academics

• GPA (UW/W): 44 IB
• Rank (or percentile): 1
• # of Honors/AP/IB/Dual Enrollment/etc.: standard ib
• Senior Year Course Load: most rigorous

Standardized Testing
List the highest scores earned and all scores that were reported.

• SAT I: 1540 (740RW, 800M)

Extracurriculars/Activities
List all extracurricular involvements, including leadership roles, time commitments, major achievements, etc.
(shuffled)

1. leadership position at a legit intl youth org
2. play an instrument for fun (upper intermediate level)
3. leadership position at another natl youth org (quit in 11th)
4. wrote for school newspaper
5. one of the leaders for school’s science club
6. coding projects i did on my own (not published or anything)
7. volunteer teacher for coding at an orphanage
8. founder of school lit mag
9. somewhat niche sport i did non-competitively
10. debate club member

Awards/Honors
List all awards and honors submitted on your application.

1. mid intl math award
2. decent intl pitch competition award
3. fluff regional math award
4. local pith competition award
5. school awards

Letters of Recommendation
(Briefly describe relationships with your recommenders and estimated rating.)
STEM teacher - 6/10? I'm not their fav student and they're not my fav teacher but I guess she thinks I'm smart?
Hums teacher - I'm their fav student and they're my fav teacher in a mutual admiration kind of way, can totally vouch for me, 9.5/10
Additional non-core teacher - offered to write me a rec, has written recs for kids who got into T10s, 9.5/10
Counselor - I guess she likes me, knows my quirks, but I'm not the most involved at school, 7/10??
Interviews
(Briefly reflect on interview experiences, if applicable)
didn't get any
Essays
(Briefly reflect on the quality of your writing, time spent, and topic of main personal statement.)

• common app: 5-8/10?? ok it depends like it's a really bizarre and cringe topic now that I reread it and if I could redo the app I'd most likely change it, but I'd say it resonates with certain types quirky of colleges? drafted the entire thing in like 2 days before jan 1 but kind of rewrote it the night before submission LMAO yes I barely had time to do apps, not with my adhd
• yale: I spent months perfecting this, 9/10
• columbia: spent nearly a week but could've been better, 7.5/10
• stanford: these were the hardest to write for some reason. kinda cliche and non-unique, 5/10
• swarthmore: I recycled a roughly-written essay (istg the word limit is so short), 7/10
• wellesley: wrote these 2 days before, love one of them but lowkey regret the other, 6/10
• amherst: i LOVED my amherst essays, 8/10
• williams: meh i wrote these the day before, 6/10

Additional Information:

• submitted creative writing portfolio to Columbia and Swarthmore despite never being published bc why not lol
• attended high school with multiple scholarships, prolly helped?

Decisions (indicate ED/EA/REA/SCEA/RD)
Acceptances:

• swarthmore

Waitlists:

• wellesley

Rejections:

• amherst
• williams

Awaiting but no chance ikik:

• yale
• columbia
• stanford

all my safeties were in other countries and wasn't expecting to get into anywhere in the us so very very pleased with that swat acceptance esp since I plan to go to grad school <3
in all honesty tho, what do yall think got me into swat bc i know my profile is v mid

Visit this page for $30 Off Ocuprime Eye Pills Coupon & Promo Codes. The website offers a wide selection of Ocuprime Eye Pills coupons, promo codes, and discount deals that are updated regularly, just visit the website to find the perfect one for you.

Use the link for $30 Off Ocuprime Eye Supplement Coupon & Promo Codes. The website features a wide selection of Ocuprime Eye Supplement coupons, promo codes, and discount deals that are updated regularly for you to choose from and make your purchase more affordable.